I know size doesn't matter, but...

[Dafydd]

So I was having a morning perusal of some of my favorite models, and I stumbled on something mighty confusing. Do Australian girls have the ability to change their heights at will?

Look at Jamie. She's probably right there, so just take a good long look at her.
*sigh*
Right. According to the Bio Pages for each of her shoots, her height is given as "170". Being an American, just having a number like that for a height is kinda confusing, but I'll hazard the guess that you're using metric measurement, and that that means she's 170 cm, or somewhere around 5' 8". Fine.

Then there's Annabel. All her solo bios agree that she's 157cm tall. (Or at least that her height is "157"). And yet, when she had the enviable G/G shoot with Jamie, their heights are listed not as 157 and 170, but as 160 and 165. So Annabel grew 3cm and Jamie shrank 5cm? (My physicist girlfriend would probably make a joke about maintaining equalibrium. The First Law of Acrodynamics?)

And to really mess with my mind, Elizabeth — her height's always given as 145. One of those small packages that good... no wait, I'd better not finish that one. Anyway, she's considered tiny. Put her with girls like Jamie and Annabel, she'd easily be the shortest. And yet, when the Six Girls shoot got put up, the height range was given as 157-168. (Did Jamie shrink again?) Ordinarily, I would surmise from that that an insignificant clercial error was involved, and Elizabeth's height was excluded from the range, and yet, when you look at Sixgirls2062, where they're all in a line, Elizabeth is taller that Annabel!

I feel a little dizzy now.

[smile_guy]

You also have waaay too much free time mate :-)

(damn now you've got me thinking about the impending Elizabeth 'Adventurous' image set .. droool)

[Vid Dude]

Okay, here's the thing.

95% of all the heights listed are accurate. We originally asked what the model's heights were, but now we can also measure them on our handy-dandy height chart. Sometimes when the models gives her height (and we don't measure) they are either guessing, or they're just misinformed. Plus, if they give their height in inches, we have to then convert to cm. So technically speaking, though the heights are "accurate" they aren't always right. (Some of our earliest models, we never asked their height, so we made it up)

Secondly, the Girl Girl shoots tend to go up on weekends. I do this from home, so do not always have to hand the information that I need to fill in the Bio correctly. On top of that, I tend to use terms like 'various' and 'all sorts' and 'big and small' or something, because I figure if you care that much how tall they are, you can check out their solo shoots.

:)

The six girls pics are possibly misleading, though, because of the uneven surfaces under the water, and because of the angles of the camera.

Having said that, I shall spend some time this week correcting obvious mistakes such as you have pointed out.

[muggins]

Here's one I spied earlier: Laura.