PDA

View Full Version : With or Without



Mrs Roops
17th September 2004, 04:43 PM
I’ve forgotten how much fun these forums are!!. Roops is clearly bonkers in not making any contris!! I shall work on him tonight!!!

Talking of which, Hurrah!! Hubby, who has been away for a couple of weeks flies back home tonight. This is good. Tomorrow night we got to go to a black-tie event, some boring civic do. This is bad. I think I want to liven things up a bit, whadya think, shall I go in a Little Black Dress with or without? You decide.

ham
17th September 2004, 04:51 PM
A little pink bow would be an atractive accesory. Ham

sweatyfox
17th September 2004, 06:15 PM
How daring do you feel Mrs Roops? Are these people at the dance gonna be bunch of very conservative toffs? If so I say without. I think either way you'd make some of the people there fairly horny, I mean even with them on, its still very enticing and if anything more of a tease.

Thanks for both these photos, both sexy in different ways. Who the heck is behind the camera, some impressive angles there which must require some interesting positioning and contortions.

SF

Mrs Roops
17th September 2004, 07:09 PM
er… Roops’ sister took the pics. After which, I lowered myself onto her face and in a sixty-nine position we then tasted each other’s wetness – not!!

Actually, my sister-in-law kept her clothes on and no funny business took place. Neither of us are even remotely bi-curious, but we are very good mates. In the past she gave me some very good advice in how to deal with Roops and was one of the very few people who supported us when Hubby and I became engaged to be married.

drew001
17th September 2004, 08:10 PM
Hee! I voted With but I was in error - definitely without. Roops is a lucky man!

Dafydd
17th September 2004, 10:43 PM
I'm all for "without"; knickers are overrated. :D

Luxman
18th September 2004, 02:38 AM
Could be fun is you go without / without. I mean without knickers and without black dress.
If you want to liven things up, this could be the right way. I wish I could be there.

Lxm

BTW: I voted for without.

vmsmith
18th September 2004, 02:54 AM
Without panties, especially in a sexy black dress, is terribly arousing. My wife surprises me like that sometimes, usually when I am completely not expecting it.

One time, she let me know that she had shaved completely bare by showing me in a restaraunt. I was coming back from the buffet to our table in the corner. She made sure that I was the only one that could see her as she pulled up her skirt and opened her legs. I almost dropped my plate, then almost choked from eating too fast. I shagged her rotten in car in the parking lot, I couldn't wait.

yachtie
18th September 2004, 02:23 PM
WITH, but suggest the small sexy variety which would expose your gorgeous bush with your pubes poking out of the edges. Small amount of sexy clothing is always more erotic than none. Always fun to pull to one side for looking, fingering, licking and fucking! I hope you let us know your decision and whether they had the desired effect for those lucky enough to experience.

ps Is AW going to encourage the regular posting of members' photos. Yours make a bloody good start!

nursefan
18th September 2004, 07:50 PM
May I suggest that Mrs Roops wears a nurses uniform instead, that will liven up proceedings a lot.

pjay
19th September 2004, 12:35 AM
Without obviously :)

Mrs Roops, you have been missed (as has your other half).

Philos
19th September 2004, 09:57 AM
Without. And might I suggest that you wear a dress that is thin and clingy enough to emphasise the fact. This will encourage your fellow diners to try and sneak a peek. What fun!

pjay
20th September 2004, 01:15 AM
So, as the original message was posted about an event on Saturday, I throw the question back at Mrs R. Did you go with or without?

Mrs Roops
20th September 2004, 01:16 AM
Well, in the end I went commando as they say. This was not done to give fellow diners a thrill as I wouldn't deliberately flash my fanny to all and sundry (That means front bottom here in the UK). Normally I dress conservatively and am not prone to wearing low-cut see-through blouses and micro-skirts. Whilst I do not deny my working class roots I enjoy being middle-class and the status of respectability that My Hubby and I enjoy. You may think that's shallow and you may be right but that's tough shit!!

Having said that I went knickerless 'cos it gave me a certain thrill to be dressed that way. At yesterday's bash were Council and Civic Leaders, an MP, an MEP, a bishop, a magistrate and other local worthies. In my pervy mind I got a kick out of having polite and meaningless conversation with the aforementioned knowing that my slit was completely exposed to the elements!!

Yachtie, good idea and thanks for the compliment!! Are you gonna post yours? Lets see if you're packing a Magnum or a Derringer underneath your trousers. I'm being cruel and inappropriate. Don't worry cos despite all the hype, size really, really does not matter. I'm happy to expand on that at another thread if anyone wishes to raise the subject!!

pjay
20th September 2004, 01:50 AM
Well, in the end I went commando as they say.

Good for you. Mind you, I bet the Bishop was also knickerless beneath his cassock ;)

If there are any more decisions you would like our input on, please feel free to post. This could be the 'diceman' of the 21st century... ;)


Yachtie, good idea and thanks for the compliment!! Are you gonna post yours?

I think he said 'members' photos', not 'photos of members'. (The old jokes are best...)

Quartz
20th September 2004, 02:01 AM
I think he said 'members' photos', not 'photos of members'. (The old jokes are best...)

Did you just call the members' members old jokes?

pjay
20th September 2004, 02:18 AM
I think I called the old members' members jokes. The young virile members' members are not jokes, though some may be quips, japes and/or clerihews.

Quartz
20th September 2004, 02:42 AM
Thanks for being so firm on the subject.

Mrs Roops
20th September 2004, 01:55 PM
If there are any more decisions you would like our input on, please feel free to postLucky, lucky me!!, Lovely husband and children, nice house, satisfying career and now this, a forum of friends who wish to make their own experience available to me in helping to make one’s lifestyle choices!! Brill!!

Well now, unless there has been an accident with my contraceptive pills, I am due to go on the blob next week and I have run out of tampons. Vexed question this, do I stay with Lil-Lets or try out Kotex tampons?

vmsmith
20th September 2004, 10:26 PM
Vexed question this, do I stay with Lil-Lets or try out Kotex tampons?[/color]

I've heard good things about Kotex, but this is a second-hand opinion. Your mileage may vary.

pjay
21st September 2004, 11:37 PM
...a forum of friends who wish to make their own experience available to me in helping to make one’s lifestyle choices!! Vexed question this, do I stay with Lil-Lets or try out Kotex tampons?
I'm not sure my experience would be too helpful in this area ;)

I like your forthright decision to post in black. Rugged individualism is to be welcomed :D

yachtie
22nd September 2004, 04:54 PM
Well, I guess us males would be better advising on with or without panties rather than tampons. Bit of a girlie one that! Suffice to say I've had quite a magnum underneath my trousers every time I've thought of your comment..."that you got a kick out of knowing your slit was completely exposed to the elements"! Looking forward to your viewpoint on size..........?

bubbatech
23rd September 2004, 08:27 AM
A Question if not too personal??

How wet did you get??

I Just Wondered??!

My friend had a girlfriend that likes to go around without panties, and she would get so excited she would drip everywhere!!!.

I suggested that she wear a tampon to stem off the tide so to speak??

just wondered how you fared?

Thanks

Mrs Roops
24th September 2004, 01:22 AM
Bubbatech, I can get very wet and squishy, but only during a full blown love making session. Yes, being knickerless in public places gives a certain frisson but not enough to drip all over the axminster.

Yachtie, I will answer this, but funnily enough I'm in a discussion right now about this subject at another forum.

yachtie
25th September 2004, 05:40 PM
Mrs Roops,

I am most intrigued as to the forum in which you are discussing size. An academic lecture perhaps, or and after dinner speech or ???? Looking forward to your answer on this embellished with a few more photos of yourself I hope!

Mrs Roops
26th September 2004, 12:38 AM
Yachtie, I just cannot reveal the other forums I frequent. It only needs one idiot to chip in a say "Cor! You can cop a load of *********** at the AW.com site. I'm sure you will understand. As for more pics of me, Roops has suggested that there is a danger of overdoing it. Thinking about it, he is probably right. I will post more pics but at some time in the future.

Luxman
26th September 2004, 01:40 AM
...I just cannot reveal the other forums I frequent. It only needs one idiot to chip in a say "Cor! You can cop a load of *********** at the AW.com site.
Hi Mrs. Roops,

You're absolutely right about that. Unfortunately the world (wide web) is full of idiots.


As for more pics of me, Roops has suggested that there is a danger of overdoing it.
It's a pity that we'll get no more pics of you, but here you're right again (and hubby also). Any thing is precious and interesting as long as it's rare. If you're overdoing, it becomes usage and banal.

So we are all looking forward to what you'll post us in the future. If there's one day a small serie of pictures again, we'll all be happy and thankful. You know, we all like looking at pics of nice young wonderful ladies (like you) with very light clothing. Hey, that's why we are here.

Lxm

BTW: It's a pleasure to have you back here.