Backstage Area [Archive] - abbywinters.com Forum

jonjuan

14th January 2002, 06:01 PM

I *love* this new backstage area. I think it's a great idea to give us a glimpse of the behind-the-scenes!

I suppose I have a slight predilection towards this from my acting/modeling days, since it brings back some memories of what it was like during the 70% of time when you weren't on camera. But more than that, I think there is an inherent curiosity of how the models behave naturally when they don't have to pose for the cameras. It also shows how much work Abby, Vid-Dude, Tahlia, etc. have to go through just to get the great shots - which doesn't even include the editing and posting work afterwards. Another added benefit is that we see more pictures of the models in different settings.

I find it gives me the "whole picture". What makes this site stand out (and better) from the rest is that it's based upon all things natural and real, added with a personal touch from Abby herself. This kind of candor is rarely seen in the porn industry, and it is this very fact that maintains such high loyalty to this site. Providing a backstage area only enhances the experience and reaffirms that commitment. It is yet another point for AbbyWinters.com

(Side note: I believe people like to see candid shots. After all, why were shows like Candid Camera and Funniest Home videos so successful and lasted so long?)

arsby

14th January 2002, 08:56 PM

And, for true perverts like me, don't forget the voyeuristic thrill of these shots.

Who are those people in the background, that sort of thing.

Catching the young lovelies off-guard, occassionally with their pants down! Literally! OY!

ruffie

16th January 2002, 03:50 AM

A+ for the backstage section. Thank you, thank you, thank you Abby. The models look entirely different in that setting. I really enjoyed and actually prefered the natural light photography. Often it seems to me that the details are more visible in the natural light. The shots in bikinis are great because the suits are so colorful against their skin. The shots in the studio were great because I don't think the models were consciously posing and it was a glimpse into their personality, I think. Anyway, would love to see more of the same.
Ruffie

Abby

16th January 2002, 05:27 AM

Glad you like it! There will be more coming.

Sorry, cannot chat, must work!

a

artful

19th January 2002, 08:45 AM

The backstage area is all I have been hoping for! Congratulations VidDue for the design as well - very classy. I was just expecting some raw pics, so the commentary that went along with it was an unexpected bonus.

I expect your current trip to Melbourne is providing you with great backstage material - are you taking lots of backstage pics this time?

Don't forget the "height pics" so we can keep an idea of the models' sizes in Susies!

Would also be fun to see some general pics of the location you're using. I expect the photo experts would like to see details of the lighting etc. you're using too, although that is a bit lost on me.

Talking Figleaf

5th May 2002, 01:03 AM

Great backstage pictures this morning (May 4th).

A couple of things come to mind.

First of all, who's that in backstage0485 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0485.JPG)? She doesn't fit your recent model profile but she looks very alert and alive. You've got another mystery guest in backstage509 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0509.JPG) but she's not as present.

Second of all I think you're sometimes too hard on yourself. Your outtakes of Susie and Nikki are still very attractive and attention getting. There are enough outtakes in that series to tell another story, more of two friends working well together and doing a great job. The original series is a lot sexier, the second is more interesting. The surrealistic bonus is you get this voyeuristic peep at two women doing a porn shoot instead of changing in a lockerroom or something. *Way* better than phony dressing-room porn shots since it was real, consensual, but (importantly) unintentional. Very cool. Thanks.

Third, I know Videodude and Elvaar want to do scenarios but trying it with amateurs is a bad idea. Trying to setup a scene with Beth and Julia when, as far as I can tell, they'd never posed nude before, never been intimate with other women, never been intimate with each other, and never been intimate on camera in a room full of busy people... (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0480.JPG) And you wonder why they froze up? There are some absolutely lovely images in the set, including backstage0486 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0486.JPG), backstage0495 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0495.JPG), backstage0507 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0507.JPG), and backstage0508 (http://www.abbywinters.com/members/gold/galleries/backstage/backstage0508.JPG). Those images intimate, graceful and very sexy, and they have nothing to do with acting out a sub/dom theme and everything to do with amateur exploration of something new. With those images it probably helps that they were tired.

Don't get me wrong about playing scenes. I think they're fine, but you only get that first-time thing once. If you can get them to come back a couple of times so they're used to the whole experience then you can do scenes. You might try it if the models are already hopelessly awkward and uninspired and you're not getting anything you want anyway -- then it might help for them to stop pretending they're gay and pretend they're actresses instead.

Finally, was Julia pregnant and did she know it yet? Elsewhere you asked us to guess which models were and I'd already thought she might have been very early. Just curious. If she's not then see if you can get her back for another round with Beth. They're both very sweet and you might get them to go further.

Thanks for the great set.

figleaf

arsby

5th May 2002, 04:38 PM

Hi, TFL.

I can answer your first questions about backstage 485 and 509.
That's Jessica. A while ago Abby had her in the "upcoming models" thumbnail row of the members page, squatting on the balcony and peeing. There is also an entry in "The Models" part of the discussion boards about her.

Anyone who follows my posts knows my appreciation of Jessica's body type (not to mention her cheerful disposition), and I've been waiting a long time to see her.

Hint, hint, wink, wink, Abby.

Arsby

P.S. I think those backstage pics are SEXY!

elvaar

6th May 2002, 02:37 AM

TFL,
Our objective hasn't been to create scenarios for the sake of trying to tell a story. If we're shooting for stills only it's pretty easy (though very time consuming) to compose each shot or sequence, but often, as was the case with Beth and Julia, we're shooting for video as well. If we threw these girls some sex toys and told them to go for it, they'd have undressed themselves then laid on their backs going through the motions of insertion. So we often concoct a premise or scenario just to give the shoot continuity, and ensure we get the shots and angles we need.

They weren't first-timers. Beth was so painfully shy (or braindead, not sure which) I can't even remember her saying a word. And although she (and Julia) had prior experience in this industry she just didn't know what to do and we had to direct pretty much every single move, which was extremely frustrating (and apparently comes through in the pictures). The images in Backstage are good BECAUSE the girls were relaxing after a shoot sequence, but without the sequence, there's no relaxing. We all wish we could have got them to relax like that all through but sometimes it just won't happen.

Our models cover the gamut of personality types and some are, unfortunatley, just asexual and don't have a clue what we want, no matter how much we patiently talk it through first. So we have to direct. And for stills, if you tried to pose each shot, you'd end up with 20 pictures rather than 200 to pick a series from - so we talk them through a sequence while Abby snaps away, and hope they can at least LOOK natural.

Fortunately there are girls who really ARE interested in what they're doing, like Susie and Nikki. We just wish it were always the case.

muggins

2nd November 2002, 07:05 PM

It's been a while since the last one, so thanks for today's backstage update -- fascinating commentary, as always. http://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif But Joanne and Mianna: stills first or video? The two commentaries contradict each other on this point. Whichever was first, I can't discern the film or stills being any less passionate than the other, resulting in the neat illusion that it was all done concurrently (as in the Susue & Nikki set).

It really amazes me, what with all the interuptions and whathaveyou, that Mianna and Joanne were able to turn in two scorching performances in a row.

Nice to see Danny crop up in a few pics too. I guess she was standing in for Susie at the time?

slipjig

2nd November 2002, 11:06 PM

I was really pleased with the new Backstage entry today - keep up the good work! I wish there were more updates in Backstage.

SJ

Vid Dude

3rd November 2002, 05:32 AM

No contradiction - Elvaar is referring to the first solo shoot, Abby is referring to the first couples shoot, which is explained as the first anything with Joanne, and in fact was videoed first, photographed a little at the same time, then photographed some more after the video was done.

I think.

I dunno, I wasn't there, so I may be mixed up also.

Abby

3rd November 2002, 07:31 AM

Hm, I thnk we did stills first. I can check the timestamps on the raw images (archived on DVD someplace... I hope), if you really care...?

a

muggins

3rd November 2002, 09:58 AM

> if you really care...?

Nah. http://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif

arsby

3rd November 2002, 01:10 PM

I saw Heidi actually smile in the new backstage pics.
And more pictures of my first and still greatest AW love, Danny.
The two of them together!
I'm happy as a clam. It's gonna be a great day!

elvaar

4th November 2002, 12:57 PM

How happy is a clam? How about a clam at a clambake? I always laugh at those signs you see on restaurants and fast food chains where the chicken/cow/pig is grinning merrily as it rotates over the BBQ with a skewer up its arse. I even saw a chicken shop once called "the happy hen".

Heidi was a tough audience, I can tell you that. Abby and I threw pretty much our whole repertoire at her and nary did a nipple jiggle mirthfully.

arsby

4th November 2002, 06:09 PM

http://www.abbywinters.com/discus/messages/7/894.jpg

Elvaar, all clams are happy when they grin at you with those wide mouths.

Heidi looks like a tough one. 'SOkay, I'll take her any way I can get her.

Danny, too. Whatever happened to her?

elvaar

5th November 2002, 03:15 AM

Arsby, that looks more like a jaffle than a clam. In fact it's so endearing I feel moved to copyright him at once and start a chain called The Happy Jaffle. It has to be easier than this business. After recent experiences I've even asked Abby if we can switch to whitegoods catalogues because fridges don't complain, don't have periods, and they usually turn up on time. Some of them are even good looking.

arsby

5th November 2002, 03:29 PM

On the other hand,
if you leave things inside them too long they get moldy,
as they get older they get noisier and more inclined to break down,
and they sometimes freeze up and it takes hours to defrost them.

Same with refrigerators.

elvaar

6th November 2002, 03:56 PM

That's very funny. I nealry splorked my coffee all over the screen.

cass

7th November 2002, 12:42 AM

I think your word "SPLORKED" is funnier xx

muggins

20th January 2003, 09:22 AM

Hiya

Even though they're no longer so prevalent in regular sets, I'm glad to see your extended motion-capture sequences (Kylie and Melissa most recently) still get an airing on backstage. Keep 'em coming.

Thanks!
Muggins

kumaraguy

20th January 2003, 09:29 AM

I whole-heartily second that!

Abby

20th January 2003, 09:35 AM

hey, glad you like 'em, guys - I was actually thinking if deleteing a bunch before I put that update up. I receive a lot of negative feedback on these series, and plenty of it from the Team here. So now I can say that at least two ppl like 'em, so, nyer. http://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif

a

kumaraguy

20th January 2003, 09:42 AM

Delete !!!
DELETE !!!
Sacri......sacrilig...
Where's that link to the dictionary site when u need it

muggins

20th January 2003, 09:58 AM

> I receive a lot of negative feedback on these
> series, and plenty of it from the Team here.

Explain yourselves, Team! Honestly, what's not to like?, especially now that they've found a more appropriate and out-of-the-way home in backstage.

Muggins http://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif

slipjig

20th January 2003, 01:50 PM

Hi All,

I was one of the original complainers, but I hereby withdraw my complaint. Part of the problem was the way that I was handling the sheer quantity of great material that is delivered here. There was so much material that I felt like it was "drinking from the firehose", and the motion capture stuff seemed unnecesary. Now I have modified the way that I handle the volume of material here, and it is much more manageable for me.

One more thing... I loved the most recent installment of Backstage. I really appreciate this aspect of the site - it gives us some pix that we never see in the regular sets, including models interacting that are never shot together. I also love the commentary - great stuff that adds life to the models and the AW crew. And as a photographer myself, I enjoy seeing the way that the equipment is set up, and the model is positioned, etc... I wish we got more BackStage stuff, but I can see that it is a lot of extra work for the crew, so I won't be a pain in the ass about it.

Thanks for all of your effort. I love it here, and I'm in for the duration.

SlipJig

BigSpud

16th June 2003, 06:40 PM

I just want to say how much I appreciate the whole Backstage area and the last 2 updates. It is really great to see naked women in a relaxed atmosphere and having fun. I think this is one of those things that gives this site the specialness it has.

arsby

17th June 2003, 02:13 PM

I appreciate the pictures of Danny in the backstage area. I love her dearly.

sweatyfox

4th October 2003, 11:58 AM

Brilliant pictures today, girls having fun, goofing off, caught off guard. I love the backstage cos it tells you a bit more about the girl's personalities and the atmosphere on shoots. On the evidence of some of todays pictures it seems like there are which make it worthwhile, models having fun and being funny. Good to see.

SF

sweatyfox

27th October 2003, 10:30 AM

It was lovely to see Cass in the most recent backstage pictures. I long suspected you guys try and make the girls feel comfortable behind the scenes. Seeing Cass being playful was great, especially with Melly! And I also like Cass's story about her smile. If posing here gives these young women more confidence, that is such a bonus. Like Cass, I hope once Melly started smiling, she went on and shared her smile with the rest of the world.

Interesting also to hear more behind the scenes on Jamie and Annabel and the stuff that goes on off camera, models feelings etc. I just hope once they got over nerves, they both enjoyed it, cos it looked like they did!

Oh and VidDude it must have been a real bummer having those 2 lovely girls getting hot and steamy in your house.

SF

Vid Dude

27th October 2003, 11:44 AM

[B]Oh and VidDude it must have been a real bummer having those 2 lovely girls getting hot and steamy in your house.Was it what! And whenever a friend was visiting, I'd be just about to tell them what had been happening, and all they could do is look at me with jealousy and say "I do not want to know!" which takes a bit of the fun out of it.

I have recently discovered that I have become something of a legend amongst that particular group of friends. Not the kind of legend that really gets me anywhere, but it's still kind of cool.

sweatyfox

1st November 2003, 10:49 AM

Again liked it a lot today, perhaps cos some past favs in there. Amongst the things I liked:

Seeing the oh so cute and lovely Isabella again with her fantastic petite little curvy body and bush, really do agree with Cass on how nice she is.
The ever playful Cass showing another reason why models must like shooting with you guys (cos you always have lovely assistants, isn't that right Jamie?).
The beautiful Tali getting gradually yellower, a funny sight but still looks gorgeous.
The outline of spunky Ellen's curves against the window.
Just the setup for each shoot, its interesting to see the equiptment, placings etc that Abby uses.

The Cass story about Amelia did made me go "Awww" as well. Its a shame when someone truly loves a place, fits in and gets on with everyone and is making the most of her time there, that she cannot remain. I can't believe someone would not have helped her out in some capacity. Yet lets just be grateful that we 'crossed paths' and that we have quality images from Abby by which to remember this fetching young lady.

SF

Jorinel

4th November 2003, 07:27 AM

Backstage 2718 - I feel I should be able to recognise the model - but I can't. Who is she?

Jorinel

sweatyfox

4th November 2003, 05:53 PM

Well spotted Jorinel. Someone needs to get on the case.

arsby

4th November 2003, 06:23 PM

Don't tell anyone, but I heard Cass caught Abby getting dressed after her nap and shot a few pictures.

Vid Dude

4th November 2003, 11:44 PM

That's Ange A (/viewbio.php?shootid=12) who shouldn't be there, she's the beginning of next week's! I shall swap her over this weekend.

icramcha

12th November 2003, 02:48 PM

[B]Don't tell anyone, but I heard Cass caught Abby getting dressed after her nap and shot a few pictures.

I'll renew my membership if you post a pic of "Dear" Abby!! he-he

sweatyfox

10th January 2004, 11:51 AM

Hi

Liked the return of backstage today. As usual, good to see the outtakes, the girls goofing off, having a laugh and just some of the more mundane things which go into each shoot.
Also like seeing staffers like Susie and Cass again is great. Some of my favourites like Violet and Molly!

I particularly liked the Rouamali/Ruamali section. Not only because I thought she was pretty but also cos of pre-shoot photos of her and the location. Pic2841 is one I particularly appreciate, of Rouamali looking lost in thought.

Violet and her cat were a funny pair, just great. In fact I like both of the pussies on view! (Okay sorry for the crappy innuendo!)

SF

Dafydd

10th May 2004, 04:30 AM

Every so often, the Backstage section has some truly wonderful pictures. In this set, 3077 is absolutely exquisite — one of those you could sell prints of in any art gallery and make tons (tonnes?) of money with — and 3086 and 3093 are marvellous as well.

Thanks for such beautiful art. :D

Dafydd—

Bob

22nd November 2004, 08:53 AM

As you can see, we debuted the Backstage section of abbywinters.com today. I am very keen to hear your opinions! Positive feedback. I really enjoy Backstage - apart from new views of known sets it regularly points me to things I've not seen, like Francis' Hot Buns. Thanks.

Bob

Luxman

22nd November 2004, 09:55 AM

As I've already said, the Backstage section is for me a great bonus and one of the most interesting things at AW.

I love it to see what's going on behind the scenes, and read about problems (the whole team being in the wrong street, ha, ha) or even funny incidents (like the boat crash). I really love it and it was surely not the least trigger for me to become a member.

Lxm

Yealith

22nd November 2004, 10:04 AM

I love it to see what's going on behind the scenes, and read about problems (the whole team being in the wrong street, ha, ha) or even funny incidents (like the boat crash). I really love it and it was surely not the least trigger for me to become a member.

Lxm
Hmmm, must have a closer look at the backstage section again, thanks for the reminder :)

rnbwpnt

22nd November 2004, 11:57 PM

okay now that this thread has been resurrected from the dead, something occurs to me: has anyone ever considered releasing an entire shoot -- bad shots, screw-ups, and all -- as a sort of "what it's really like" example? abby has said in the past that on some shoots she takes as many as 800 frames, yet on a standard blue set arsby will cut that to 250 tops. another dozen or so might show up in backstage sometime the next year, and the rest never see the light of day.

maybe put something like that in deviations, and remove only the pics that give away personal details (i.,e. no shots of the model holding up her ID), but leave the rest, including the fuzzy non-shots that always happen, just for the heck of it?

Talking Figleaf

23rd November 2004, 12:25 AM

has anyone ever considered releasing an entire shoot -- bad shots, screw-ups, and all -- as a sort of "what it's really like" example?

...

maybe put something like that in deviations, and remove only the pics that give away personal details (i.,e. no shots of the model holding up her ID), but leave the rest, including the fuzzy non-shots that always happen, just for the heck of it?

I was asking myself the same question last night. It would be instructive, and entertaining, to see a full set "warts and all." I'm not sure Abby would be happy with it as she's understandably particular about photo presentation. If I were a professional photographer I might not want anyone to see my dud photos either.

I believe, though, that the bigger issue isn't photo quality but redundancy. Abby's camera shoots something like eight frames per second and she shoots aggressively so editing mostly involves weeding out near duplicates.

If the programmer wasn't already up to his neck getting and keeping the site running efficiently I'd suggest that AW go one step further and create a mashup/remix page where we could each try our hand at editing a single full photoset down to 100-125 images. Probably more hassle than it's worth though. The easy part would be storing each remix as a string of indexes to the shots. The hard part would be creating the interface -- 800 thumbnails with checkboxes might be a bit, um, processor and bandwidth intensive! :-)

figleaf

Abby

23rd November 2004, 05:53 AM

I believe, though, that the bigger issue isn't photo quality but redundancy. Abby's camera shoots something like eight frames per second and she shoots aggressively so editing mostly involves weeding out near duplicates.

This is correct, there are often alot of motor drive sequences. You'll just have to trust me when I tell you, you're not missing iut on ANYTHING good (that goes in the image set proper) or interesting but bad (That goes in to backstage).

Promise.

Back me up, Arsby?

a

Luxman

23rd November 2004, 06:17 AM

This is correct, there are often alot of motor drive sequences.
Perhaps it's officially named this way, but honestly, I find "motor drive" with a digital camera a bit funny. :)
Does the motor drive the memory card?

Lxm

Abby

23rd November 2004, 06:27 AM

No, the motor drives the mirror and shutter, via a cam. :P

a

ham

23rd November 2004, 04:10 PM

This is correct, there are often alot of motor drive sequences. You'll just have to trust me when I tell you, you're not missing iut on ANYTHING good (that goes in the image set proper) or interesting but bad (That goes in to backstage).

a
It seems to me we all joined Abby for the quality. Besides the extra work involved in putting less than great photos on the site it would detract from what we joined for, quality not quantity. Tnks Abby

arsby

24th November 2004, 03:43 PM

Hi,

I'm the lucky fellow who looks through the "raw" sets of the shoots and culls them down to a manageable size.

Raw shoots usually have between 500 and 1000 images. More for girl/girl and masturbation sets.

There is LOTS of duplication where Abby's trying to get just the right viewpoint, or just the right exposure, or just the right focus. Some sequences of these might be interesting for a student of photography, but for most of us (including me) they're repetitive and boring. You see the best shots.

There are a few pictures where the model is in between expressions, where her face (or pussy) is hidden by hair or another body part, closeups where you can't tell what you're looking at, images that are completely out of focus or badly over- or under-exposed.

My promise to you -- I don't leave any type of picture out.
Some of you like clothed sequences, some of you really like knickers, some of you like shots of the back, some of you like hands inside knickers, some of you like the nape of the neck, some of you like armpits, some of you (perverts, mostly) like the inside of the knee.
If Abby has taken a type of picture and at least one of them is in focus and exposed decently, you'll see it. Promise.

Yealith

24th November 2004, 04:02 PM

.... some of you (perverts, mostly) like the inside of the knee.

That´s exactly what I´ve been looking for,.... for ages :D and the only reason why I´m here!

rnbwpnt

24th November 2004, 11:42 PM

some of you (perverts, mostly) like the inside of the knee.

Hey now! I resemble that remark!

ag

Talking Figleaf

5th December 2004, 08:24 AM

You've all done a great job with the site redesign. Things seem to be running pretty smoothly. So thanks.

Now that I've buttered you up, I've got a request for the backstage section. :-)

Since they're running sometimes more than a year after the model's shoots have appeared on the site I think it would be helpful to folks who haven't been around as long as some of us old-timers if you'd post links to the model's gallery page when you write up your commentary.

For example

4549 - 4556 Kasey (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=329)
Cass: Before Kasey shot through, we did manage to get her back in for a redux shoot. That's why it all seemed so confusing that she never came that day, after visiting us twice. Very strange *strokes chin thoughtfully*. You have to admit, she has probably got the most amazing skin out of all our models. It's flawless. And she really is a total sweetheart, and was a lot of fun to hang with for an afternoon.

figleaf

Tek-R

5th December 2004, 10:30 AM

Just looking at the backstage pics & this (http://www.abbywinters.com/goldcontent/Backstage_44/backstage44/backstage4557.jpg) face pops up quite often, i'm thinking its a staff member, but dont know the name?

Any chance of a set? ;)

Tek.

Vid Dude

5th December 2004, 10:47 AM

That's Cass (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=25) who was our model liaison for our time in Sydney 2002-2003.

Tek-R

5th December 2004, 11:07 AM

Cheers,

Cass is very nice! :D

She still with you?

Tek.

muggins

5th December 2004, 11:48 AM

Cass left a while back, but there's still a whole lot of Cass goodness on the forums. Here's something for starters:

http://www.abbywinters.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1640
http://www.abbywinters.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=1703

: )

Dafydd

5th December 2004, 01:52 PM

I like the shots of Jamie and Claudette together. God bless pokey nipples! :)

Jorinel

6th December 2004, 07:57 AM

That's Cass (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=25) who was our model liaison for our time in Sydney 2002-2003.

Hey Vid Dude

If you ever are in contact with Cass - get her to come & contribute to Cass's crappy joke thread (bring it on) (http://http://www.abbywinters.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=759) again. It would be good to get her sense of humour back here from time to time.

Jorinel

pixiepeapod

6th December 2004, 11:44 AM

Hello everyone,

Sorry to start off on here with what is probably a stupid question, but as I go through the backstage area (which I love) I come across girls and have no idea who they are, as the descriptions to each photo don't seem to always make sense.

For example, can anyone tell me who this is?

http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=image&index=47&shoot=1652

Thanks!

Vid Dude

6th December 2004, 11:55 AM

That's the legendary Jamie (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=240), who is our current head model liaison and video camera operator, amongst so many other things.

The reason she (and Cass, and Susie, and Danny, and Charlie, and sometimes a couple of others) keep reappearing in our backstage pics is because they are always present at each shoot.

pixiepeapod

6th December 2004, 11:57 AM

I knew that....honest!

Wow.....why don't girls like that want to work for planning consultants in Cumbria? Life's not fair.

Luxman

6th December 2004, 11:57 AM

Hi pixiepeapod,

Welcome to AW & the boards.

To answer your question: The nice lady is Jamie, former model & today member of AW staff.

You can find more of her here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=62), here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=240), here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=462), here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=138), here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=282), here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=401) and finally here (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=391).

I hope this helps. Enjoy

Lxm

Luxman

6th December 2004, 11:58 AM

I hate that, grrrrrr!

Lxm

BTW: Hey Vid Dude, at this time you should be sleeping!

pixiepeapod

6th December 2004, 12:04 PM

Thanks Luxman.....I like Jamie!

Was in Luxembourg last year to watch my team (Ipswich) play Avenir Beggen. Nice place.

Luxman

6th December 2004, 12:07 PM

Was in Luxembourg last year to watch my team (Ipswich) play Avenir Beggen. Nice place.
Thanks, you're right, it's a nice place, but we are crap in football (soccer for US readers). ;)

Lxm

pjay

6th December 2004, 10:42 PM

Wow.....why don't girls like that want to work for planning consultants in Cumbria?
I think the question kind of answers itself. ;)

Nice lakes and mountains though. Welcome :)

Bob

24th January 2005, 08:10 AM

Abby,

And now you turn up some unused Six Girls shots in Backstage 52. How wonderful! More positive feedback ...

elfie

24th January 2005, 09:40 PM

can't wait for lost vids of this spectacular event

Vid Dude

24th January 2005, 09:42 PM

You'll be waiting a long time. There aren't any.

Dafydd

25th January 2005, 12:14 AM

Boy, they really were lost, weren't they? :p

Yeah, the Six Girls stuff was my favorite part of this week's Backstage, too.

Jorinel

25th January 2005, 07:49 AM

Abby

25th January 2005, 08:00 AM

that's cos we're behind in editing the backstage pics, and we have just reached the end of a lot of work that we did a year a go. I am knee deep in editing new mackstage material now. There is so much work to be done on these (it's far and away the complex editing stuff we have to do), we try to do a few thousand at a time, cos it takes so long to get back in to the mindset, if you know what I mean.

Anyway, we'll have the samples again soon, prolly for next week. I hope.

a

Jorinel

25th January 2005, 08:14 AM

I am knee deep in editing new mackstage material now.

I presume that that's Dirty Green Mack stage material :D

Anyway, we'll have the samples again soon, prolly for next week. I hope.

Thanks Abby

Jorinel

Dafydd

30th January 2005, 03:08 PM

More Six Girls! Wonderful! Now see, that's where there should've been extra video — a behind-the-scenes documentary on this historic shoot!

Oh, and Note To Vid Dude: Backstage 5560 really, really needs to be a calendar. :D

Luxman

30th January 2005, 03:30 PM

Now see, that's where there should've been extra video — a behind-the-scenes documentary on this historic shoot!
Omigod, you're waking up elfie. :)

Lxm

Howie348

30th January 2005, 03:33 PM

I nominate Backstage 5564 for that calendar. Talk about Jamie looking spunky!
This entire baskstage set is spectacular. The 6 Girls portion is like being backstage while runway models are changing during a show. Or having a pass to the changing rooms at Sears, only with all hot young girls shopping that day.

elfie

30th January 2005, 05:55 PM

Six girls event - wish there was more stuff like this; and its already been acknowledged that there are more vids (rough stuff, lower quality, etc) - its too bad we won't see more of this

is another event like this planned? maybe a reunion?

i love the BG stuff (a nice sprinkling is fun) - why not do more BG after featuring a girl in a pictorial, for some reason its not happening

Vid Dude

30th January 2005, 09:21 PM

Oh, and Note To Vid Dude: Backstage 5560 really, really needs to be a calendar. :D
Wallpaper, maybe. Calendar, no. (There's no outright nudity in the calendars).

Vid Dude

3rd February 2005, 01:25 AM

Vid Dude

I notice that the links from Next Week's programme for the Backstage sets no longer have a teaser shot, but simply link to the Backstage main page. I think this is a pity as the funny pictures which have turned up there are a great teaser. Would you reconsider this decision?

Jorinel
New sample pics are up for Backstage in the schedule, and they should continue to be there for the next few months, at least until the next time we need to catch up.

Darth Dave

3rd February 2005, 05:29 AM

This it just too funny :D

Dave

Jorinel

3rd February 2005, 07:50 AM

New sample pics are up for Backstage in the schedule, and they should continue to be there for the next few months, at least until the next time we need to catch up.
Thanks for that Vid Dude: all of you at abbywinters.com listen to your customers - and sometimes give us what we ask for!

Jorinel

Longcar

6th February 2005, 03:39 PM

I don't know whether it's galloping old age, or just Sunday morning sleepies sorta thing, but on viewing the Backstage 53, I find it difficult, as I have done with other b/s sets, to sort out just who is who. F'rinstance, the girl who appears to be non-white. The one pic in profile, shows the most astounding pair of hard, very erect nipples that even I have seen in a long time. So, which one is she? Try as I might, I can't correlate the image with the profile page. Which leads me to my point. Would it not be possible to insert on the profile page, along with the names and description, the numbers of the pics involved, in this case it is the set 5645 to 5648 incl. Just a thought, but also, maybe I missed something along the way in the past..

casgrain

6th February 2005, 04:02 PM

Hey loncar, that would be Dewi, she was up about 2 weeks ago in a redux shoot.

casgrain

Quartz

6th February 2005, 04:07 PM

Would it not be possible to insert on the profile page, along with the names and description, the numbers of the pics involved, in this case it is the set 5645 to 5648 incl.
I think someone forgot to do that this time (or decided it is no longer worth it). The backstage sets used to contain those numbers until fairly recently.

casgrain

6th February 2005, 04:27 PM

I think someone forgot to do that this time (or decided it is no longer worth it). The backstage sets used to contain those numbers until fairly recently.

Actually, it's been stopped, since backstage #46. I did like it when it was numbered, because it gave us a chance to identify the models without having to search thru the models file.

casgrain

Dafydd

6th February 2005, 04:50 PM

Strip21 outtakes! Love 'em! :D Elizabeth always had the best facial expressions of any model in the game. (If that "nice boy" she's settled down with is the reason she shaves now, he needs some treatment — Clockwork Orange style!)
Seeing Jamie in that test shoot in all those layers of black made me think she should have been the Final Showdown model for Strip 21: The Championship Series! :D

So sorry that Rebecca/Kristy shoot got stopped. It looks like it would've been a beauty. :(

Questa1

6th February 2005, 04:54 PM

"threatend with violence" ??! maybe he was jealous

Vid Dude

6th February 2005, 09:38 PM

Session Start: Sun Dec 19 17:22:12 2004
abby: I think we should ditch the numbers for the backstage shoots, they are redundant, really
vid dude: Really? Or are you just bored with figuring them out?
abby: it's not that hard to figure them out -we'll still keep the names, of course
abby: but the numbers are just redundant

pjay

7th February 2005, 12:20 AM

This last backstage set (53) didn't quite manage to get all the names though. Josephine and Peta made unannounced (but very welcome) appearances. (OK, so Peta's photo is on the profile page, but her name is not mentioned).

(Also, is that a vidoe camera I see in the Peta pics - oh joy!)

Longcar

7th February 2005, 02:12 AM

Thank you , Casgrain, you horny Quebecois. You straighterned that out nicely. Personally, for the rest of you, the numbers do help, but I presume your reasons for dropping them made sense to the dropper, or is that 'droppee'?

Vid Dude

7th February 2005, 02:18 AM

This last backstage set (53) didn't quite manage to get all the names though. Josephine and Peta made unannounced (but very welcome) appearances. (OK, so Peta's photo is on the profile page, but her name is not mentioned).
That's because Jamie was unable to get her email to me, due to some stupid glitch we're suffering through at the moment. But they're up now.

Jettman

7th February 2005, 07:38 AM

I just finished looking at the Backstage 53 set and I have a question.

Is that a partial shot of Abby on the left side of photo "backstage5695.jpg"?

Maybe if I carefully examine the backgrounds of all the other Backstage sets I could piece together a composite of her. Sadly if she takes all the photos, the only missing part will be her face covered by the camera. :(

Unless she uses a remote shutter! There may be hope after all. :D

arsby

7th February 2005, 02:30 PM

I'd be careful if I were you, Jettman.

There are rumors that any male who looks directly at Abby's face, or even an image of Abby's face, turns (figuratively speaking) into a quivering bowl of jello and must spend the rest of his life in a sanitarium, recovering from the shock to his system.

By not showing her face, she is doing us a favor.

Viddude must wear polarized sunglasses at all times in the her esteemed presence.

Luxman

7th February 2005, 02:41 PM

...

By not showing her face, she is doing us a favor.
I hope you're not telling us by this that she's so extremely ugly.

Anyway, I won't believe you.

Lxm

BigSpud

7th February 2005, 03:30 PM

I hope you're not telling us by this that she's so extremely ugly.

Anyway, I won't believe you.

LxmOr so overwhelmingly beautiful that she "takes your breath away". Then of course you would be dead and that would severely limit the site enjoyment and renewals and revenue for AW. So maybe that is the motiviation?

drew001

7th February 2005, 09:47 PM

Even without seeing any pictures, we already know that she's beautiful. (And talented! Thanks Abby!)

drew001

7th February 2005, 09:50 PM

P.S. I loved the mini pee set in this week's backstage. Would love to hear more of the story of how you got the boot before it could be completed.

Jettman

8th February 2005, 02:21 AM

I liked the pee shots in this weeks backstage53 set as well. My favorite was the one with the model on her hands and knees and seen from behind. I don't belive that I have seen this pose before in other photo sets. Usually the girls are always shown standing or squating. I hope that this pose will be repeated in an upcomming series. Please?

Abby

8th February 2005, 02:25 AM

yah, been on my list for ages. I'll work harder on making this happen!

a

Howie348

8th February 2005, 04:30 PM

I agree with what Drew and Jettman have said. We know that beauty's only skin deep. Also, that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. And that it takes one to know one. Abby beholds that beauty in her models, and it's beauty that goes beyond the hot-looking blond on another site who might not have anything else going for her. Abby photographs her models in a way that shows their natural beauty to its fullest extent. For that alone, she is a beautiful person. And, Jettman, I had the same reaction to that pee photo. Being one of the most enthusiastic supporter of pee pics on this site, I'd love to see more -- if other girls are even capable anatomically of peeing that way.

BigSpud

20th February 2005, 03:56 PM

Dear Abby,

Please do not use that new camera again if it takes such small pictures. I realize that it may be too late for some pics, but stop now so future pics are "regular" size and quality.

Yours truly,

Big Backstage Fan

That would have been a great down-blouse pic of Emma R

Luxman

20th February 2005, 04:06 PM

Dear Spud,

The problem was not the "new" camera, the problem was that it had the wrong settings. As Vid Dude wrote: "Oopsy".
I think next time they will do better.

BTW: This remembers me the following:
Where in a computer system is the biggest bug located? Between the chair and the keyboard!

Lxm - big backstage fan too

Philos

20th February 2005, 04:29 PM

Where in a computer system is the biggest bug located? Between the chair and the keyboard!
And in a car it's the nut that holds the steering wheel.

BigSpud

20th February 2005, 05:47 PM

Dear Spud,

The problem was not the "new" camera, the problem was that it had the wrong settings. As Vid Dude wrote: "Oopsy".
I think next time they will do better....When I read 'settings' I was thinking of shutter speed and exposure. I thought after I sent it that perhaps the resolution was the main thing that was set wrong.

Dear Abby,

Please continue to use the new "candid camera" on backstage shots, but please remember to check the settings. :)

BBS Fan

Dafydd

20th February 2005, 07:45 PM

So I'm looking through the newest Backstage set (Backstage 55), and I see several people I don't recognize. Who are:

The brunette with the fuzzy microphone in 5801 & 5802;

The subject of 5876-5879; and

The woman behind the reflector in 5901?

(By the way, Jamie, I'm sorry to hear that no suitable G/G shoot with Jacinta could be arranged. On the other hand, could such a shoot have been as sexy as the video of Jacinta and you in the shower together? I don't think so. :D)

Luxman

20th February 2005, 08:17 PM

The brunette with the fuzzy microphone in 5801 & 5802;
That is Joanne (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=81), ok she has changed her look a bit since her shoots.

The subject of 5876-5879; and...
Jeannie (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=458)

The woman behind the reflector in 5901?
Here I'm sorry, I'm not able to identify her.

Lxm

Vid Dude

20th February 2005, 09:30 PM

The woman behind the reflector in 5901?
Aside from Jamie, the other woman is the person who lives in the house where those pics were taken. She will be known as Jane Doe.

Abby

20th February 2005, 09:36 PM

That's not Joanne, that's Lani!

The woman behind the reflector is a friend of ours who helped out on Jacinta's shoot.

a

Luxman

20th February 2005, 09:40 PM

That's not Joanne, that's Lani!
Oops, sorry, I need to clean my glasses.

Lxm

Gerza71

21st February 2005, 02:04 PM

Is that Amber climbing that tree next Sunday (not this coming Sunday) Backstage?

From

GCG71'living in the sunniest state in Australia'

Dafydd

21st February 2005, 03:37 PM

That's not Joanne, that's Lani!
Lani. Ok. She work for you too, or was she just there with the shoot that day?

(Joanne was the blonde in the red jumper just before Jeannie's pics, right?)

Luxman

21st February 2005, 08:01 PM

Is that Amber climbing that tree next Sunday (not this coming Sunday) Backstage?
Yes, that's Amber A. I'm sure, I've cleaned my glasses.

Lxm

Vid Dude

21st February 2005, 09:19 PM

Lani. Ok. She work for you too, or was she just there with the shoot that day?Lani works for us very casually.

drew001

27th February 2005, 07:36 PM

Sorry to hear the Robin & Alex shoot didn't go well. Boys are tricky sometimes!

artlover

27th February 2005, 07:55 PM

I have never had to deal with this kind of exposure, but it's possible that my, ahem, John Thomas would stand up better to private examination than public testimony.

So to speak. :)

drew001

6th March 2005, 08:49 PM

So who's the girl with the black curly hair in Backstage 6039 (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=image&index=18&shoot=1844)? Curious...

Luxman

6th March 2005, 08:55 PM

So who's the girl with the black curly hair in Backstage 6039 (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=image&index=18&shoot=1844)? Curious...
That's Lani (http://abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=422).

Lxm

BTW: I'm right this time. :)

jamitch3

7th March 2005, 03:54 AM

I got a huge laugh out of this one. Be sure and click the link and get a look at the expression on the dog's face!

:D

arsby

7th March 2005, 03:57 AM

BWAHAHAHAHA!

Great catch, Jamitch.

Abby

7th March 2005, 04:20 AM

I got a huge laugh out of this one. Be sure and click the link and get a look at the expression on the dog's face!

Yah, that's me yelling at Ellie to bring the models' knickers back.

She never listens to a word I say...

a

Henry1

7th March 2005, 04:53 AM

Yah, that's me yelling at Ellie to bring the models' knickers back.

a
Hi Abby!

That's a really funny shot! I must say, if I had a dog, I would love to train him/her to do that trick, just for those times when my female friends come over to visit. hehehehe ;)

artlover

7th March 2005, 01:30 PM

She never listens to a word I say...
I have a companion like that, only he wears a cat suit :D Keeps me humble, he does... He's never shown an interest in knickers--I guess he delegates that to me... ;)

Longcar

3rd April 2005, 03:47 PM

I know that I mentioned this sometime ago, but I still believe that it would be an advantage to re-start the model identity picture numbering process in B/S if only so that we who are hampered by non-availability of hi-speed access can figure out who is who without wasting the entire day doing it by going back and forth like yo-yos. After all, in thumbs a blonde is a blonde, and many look similar until enlarged, and that takes time. And of course hair up or down, and lighting makes a huge diff to hair colour in thumbs. Todays batch I found particularly confusing, and I don't think it's just age. Maybe it's the fact that we got another 2" of snow o/n after I put my summer tires back on on Friday, I don't know. L

Dafydd

3rd April 2005, 05:10 PM

I think you're right, Vid Dude — Backstage6589 does look better landscape! :p

I love the Miranda/Stephanie outtakes. Especially the one of Miranda peeking up at the camera from between Staphanie's legs. :D

BigSpud

3rd April 2005, 06:21 PM

I know that I mentioned this sometime ago, but I still believe that it would be an advantage to re-start the model identity picture numbering process in B/S... LI too would appreciate that. I missed it very much when it changed. I understand it takes more time, and I appreciate that. Thanks.

Spud

BigSpud

3rd April 2005, 06:26 PM

:) Who is that with Anastasia in 6517?

Darth Dave

3rd April 2005, 06:35 PM

:) Who is that with Anastasia in 6517?
I was wondering the same thing.

Dave

Luxman

3rd April 2005, 06:49 PM

:) Who is that with Anastasia in 6517?
Perhaps the answer is here.

Lxm

BigSpud

3rd April 2005, 09:02 PM

Perhaps the answer is here.
LxmI read the post 3 times before I realized that the answer was not in the post but in the poster. Danke. :)

Vid Dude

3rd April 2005, 10:39 PM

Kitsune wasn't strictly meant to be a model liaison, but at times, when we were particularly busy, she was called on to assist. She doesn't work with us any longer, her role has been taken by Beatrice.

Maxybabyx

4th April 2005, 06:44 AM

I too would appreciate that. I missed it very much when it changed. I understand it takes more time, and I appreciate that. Thanks.

Spud Yes, I agree. Those numbers help identify the models, I don't really think they are redundant ~ would you perhaps reconsider dearest Abby? :)

Max

oncall

4th April 2005, 10:04 AM

Yes, I agree. Those numbers help identify the models, I don't really think they are redundant ~ would you perhaps reconsider dearest Abby? :)

MaxYes, I agree the numbers would be a great help. I looked back at some of the Backstage sets before I joined up and it is a lot easier to find out who the women are. Not all of us have a photographic memory of the models faces like some of Abby's long time members.:D :D :D

Oncall

Darth Dave

8th May 2005, 07:07 PM

Are pics 7078-7081 of Marcella in today’s backstage from a new set or just pics that weren't included in her other sets?

Dave

Luxman

8th May 2005, 07:12 PM

Are pics 7078-7081 of Marcella in today’s backstage from a new set or just pics that weren't included in her other sets?
I think these are typical outtakes from the redux set.

Lxm

Abby

9th May 2005, 01:46 AM

Are pics 7078-7081 of Marcella in today’s backstage from a new set or just pics that weren't included in her other sets?

She was trying to do pee stuff, but could not manage it, unfortunately.

a

Gerza71

18th May 2005, 01:12 PM

Abby I on a mission. My mission is to download every backstage gallery there is in this site and I will keep going to the end of my subscribition. I notice in the information in some of the backstage bio you forget some shots like 'I forget all about this one and I forget about that one' can I make a suggestion. Sometimes I forget things when I work, or when I had a dream and when I want to write it down afterwards or when I wake up I forget all about it. My suggestion is can you keep a diary and write notes what you done and what happened durning the shot no matter how big or small it is. Its only a suggestion and maybe alread told you about it. BTW I up to 46. The rate I going I maybe finish this lot after this weekend.

From
GCG71

Abby

19th May 2005, 01:17 AM

uh, well, yes. But unfortunately I have 28759123 other things to do at the end of a shoot, so that has to take a back seat.

a

BigSpud

19th May 2005, 03:07 AM

uh, well, yes. But unfortunately I have 28759123 other things to do at the end of a shoot, so that has to take a back seat.

aI see that the count is down a bit. You must be getting organized. Good Job!! :)

Gerza71

19th May 2005, 10:40 AM

Gosh Abby I did not know you got that much to do after a shoot. Twenty things after the shoot yes but not 28759123??

From
GCG71

ps you left 4 and 6 out

Gerza71

20th May 2005, 10:52 AM

I have a question to ask? Who was taking the backstage pic and who was taking the pic of Peta putting that toy (cucumber) in herself in pic backstage5681 in Backstage 53. Because I notice in the exterm right of that photo. It someones hair. Is it Jamie or is it Abby?

From
GCG71.

heragin

20th May 2005, 11:00 AM

There is even more to speculate on in backstage5695 :)

martynzx6r

29th May 2005, 06:57 PM

Hi all
Just wondering if some kind person could let me know who the beautiful young lady is in Backstage 46 pics 4836~4838
thank you very much

muggins

29th May 2005, 07:07 PM

That's Joanne (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=models&search=Joanne&allsections=yes&exactmatch=yes)!

Whilst I'm here, the gallery thumb for backstage 45 seems to be missing.

Darth Dave

29th May 2005, 07:08 PM

Hi all
Just wondering if some kind person could let me know who the beautiful young lady is in Backstage 46 pics 4836~4838

Joanne (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=profile&model=81) She looks different in her shoots.

Dave

Vid Dude

29th May 2005, 11:25 PM

Whilst I'm here, the gallery thumb for backstage 45 seems to be missing.
No it ain't. I reckons you needs to refresh.

baboo

20th June 2005, 07:42 AM

When we tell people what we do for a living, they have a bit of a distorted idea of what goes on behind the scenes during a shoot. Backstage is where you can see the truth, with images showing the team at work, as well as commentary describing some of the events surrounding it all.

Thanks for clearing that up. I had this really distorted view that there was nothing but hanky panky going on backstage. ;)

http://media.abbywinters.com/gold/Backstage_03/backstage_imgset268/backstage0241.jpg

Abby

20th June 2005, 08:06 AM

yeah... we don't really do stuff like that any more. Crikey that Tahlia was a hellcat (and Charlie was worse!).

a

susie

20th June 2005, 08:28 AM

aah, the good old days!

s

Philos

20th June 2005, 01:18 PM

yeah... we don't really do stuff like that any more.
Could you direct me to someone who does? ;)

Gerza71

24th July 2005, 10:48 PM

Abby did Emelia made that much of an impact to you that when you took some photos of her in the start of Backstage 77 that she made you nervous or the camera is too slow to respond? I think is the former.

Damn!! I thought the you Abby got busted. Bugger. Why I said that because nearly at the end of backstage with Eugenia when Verity took a shot of the window and window reflex back I though it was you. But it was Verity. Buggar. You are a hard woman to catch!!

To finish of that is a great sample shot of Backstage 78 in coming nextweek section on the left.

From
GCG71

Darth Dave

31st July 2005, 11:41 AM

I was just wondering are Anthea’s pics in the backstage 78 form a redux set that hasn't been uploaded yet or just extra pics from her first redux videos.

Dave

arsby

31st July 2005, 10:27 PM

Darth Dave, all the images you see in the backstage section are from sets already at the site.
No "sneak previews" there.

In some cases the "tone" of a backstage set is serious, so the non-serious backstage outtakes form a sort of a "shadow set". But still, no sneak previews.

artlover

1st August 2005, 12:19 AM

I am reeling from the revelation that a) there was a car being washing during a shoot with b) Anthea and that A and B were not placed in close proximity.:(:( Anyone who has seen Cool Hand Luke knows whereof I speak... Hey--neighbors can be bribed...

BigSpud

21st August 2005, 04:40 PM

What a fun set! Chloe B and Rosanna look like they were having a blast as well as verity

Toward the end there is some excellent advice posted on a sign: "Pedestrians give way to trams"

Rosanna, is that an engagement ring you are flashing in pic 8789?

I tried my best CSI image enhancement techniques on the text on the phone in pic 8804, but I cannot read the text.

Thanks Ladies!!!! :o <3

Peter552

21st August 2005, 08:52 PM

Of course, you never get red-eye on AW.com, but it looks like Chloe has a case of red-nipple (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=image&index=112&shoot=2447)! :p

Gerza71

22nd August 2005, 04:39 AM

I got a feeling Abby that you are running out of backstage material? Or is just me?

From
GCG71

Abby

22nd August 2005, 04:59 AM

no - what gives you that idea? We have more than ever. Way more.

a

wanderer611

22nd August 2005, 06:41 AM

hi

As you can see, we debuted the Backstage section of abbywinters.com today. I am very keen to hear your opinions! There is heaps more material to come, of course. What is there currently is just a taste.

As I am about to start shooting again in Melbourne, ideas for the type of shots you'd like to see in the future are welcome!

abbyI liked it very much, but I would have liked to see naked the photographer too.Bye.

Gerza71

22nd August 2005, 07:05 AM

Why I said that because in the last two backstage there are less models then the usuall. Thats all. Also it wasn't long time ago that we had that G/G shot of Chloe B & Rosanna and I might me afraid that the backstage might catch up. You never know, one of the last week new models like Marianne will be showing up in four weeks in backstage.

From
GCG71

BigSpud

22nd August 2005, 09:21 AM

I liked it very much, but I would have liked to see naked the photographer too.Bye.Hi Wanderer, Welcome and glad you wandered over to the boards! Check out the site FAQ (http://www.abbywinters.com/main.php?page=wiki&id=AwFAQ) for an answer to your question. It is 2nd from the last in the first section.

Abby

22nd August 2005, 09:46 AM

gerza,

there are fewer models cos we have more good images per shoot (I reckon). I never edit the BS sets down, in fact, I do no look at the image count at all when editing, it just comes down to how many pics I reckon should be keepers. With suh good subject matter, you can imagine that there's going to be a lot from the chloe and rosanna shoot.

As you suspect, we are catching up (cos this time last year, we were adding no backstage. So from now on, we're going to add one backstage set every few weeks, and in the other weeks, we're going to add IM videos.

And holy fucking shit, there are some awesome vids there. Sorry you're still on dialup, dude. :/

a