New After Dark Solo: Susie
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New After Dark Solo: Susie
Collapse
X
-
Well IMHO this is the best of a poor lot. Good points: lovely model in Susie, good lighting effects and no silly colour effects. Bad points: no interaction with the model (at least on the preview) which makes the video soulless and is very un AW, pretty pointless effect around the edges of the photos which distracts from the model and quality of the photography, taking up a slot for a proper photo set instead of (as promised) having it's own pod so that those that want it can subscribe and those that don't can enjoy the usual fare
Comment
-
Hmm. If Susie's now 26 years old, and her first AW shoot was posted in December 2001, then she must have been about (26 - (2011 - 2001)) 16 at the time of her first shoot! Hopefully my math is flawed.
Comment
-
I think this was a great set. The best of the AD series so far, though I still enjoyed the Anneke-Giselle T3 minus the scratchy effect. This is what I had in my mind for what the AD shoots were all about. Beautiful models, a little more glammed up, dark yet still beautiful lighting. Susie is gorgeous as always. I don't mind the frame effect on the edges. It doesn't detract from Susie's beauty. No fake-seeming color effects as with Kiki and Kelly M's shoots. Bravo! Y'all really got it right with this one!! I'll reserve judgement on the video until it actually comes out.
Originally posted by AarontheMoor View PostHmm. If Susie's now 26 years old, and her first AW shoot was posted in December 2001, then she must have been about (26 - (2011 - 2001)) 16 at the time of her first shoot! Hopefully my math is flawed.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AarontheMoor View PostHmm. If Susie's now 26 years old, and her first AW shoot was posted in December 2001, then she must have been about (26 - (2011 - 2001)) 16 at the time of her first shoot! Hopefully my math is flawed.
As for the shoot itself, I prefer lighter shoots.. i.e. Susie frolicking in the green fields The stills look a bit dark (as in; to shadowy) to me. I can see why it was done, I just prefer to see more. I'm boring that way Then again, it IS a Susie shoot, which is always a good thing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by AarontheMoor View PostHmm. If Susie's now 26 years old, and her first AW shoot was posted in December 2001, then she must have been about (26 - (2011 - 2001)) 16 at the time of her first shoot! Hopefully my math is flawed.
At the moment when this set was shot, she was 26, it's some time ago.
Lxm
Comment
-
Much better than the other AD sets that have been posted so far.
I know it's supposed to be dark but a bit more light on the model and a bit less on the wall would have made it a lot better.
Still, at least I have 161 really good shots of some tasteless wallpaper.
Comment
-
The video is exceptional, the best of the After Dark series to date. The closeups are outstanding. I especially liked the closeups of Susie's hands playing over that beautiful matching lingerie. Goodness, that may be the hottest lingerie set we've ever seen on AW!
Originally posted by konathan View PostI prefer seeing porn in rembrandt lighting.. Not in artistic lighting.. She is beautiful.. But the lighting sucked...!!!!Last edited by bookmanz; 31 July 2011, 01:50 PM.
Comment
Comment