New Model: Kimberley

[redlabka]

It's the first time that we see this name.
Is it his first shoot?
Does he work for AW or is is he a contractor?
Is he in Amsterdam or somewhere else?

[bookmanz]

[tjsunray]

[ATTACH]30638[/ATTACH]

Booky...are you saying you'll be going to the movies tonight ?

[bookmanz]

Booky...are you saying you'll be going to the movies tonight ?

Sometimes these boards are more humorous than the movies. I'm going to relax with my popcorn and watch the fun as it ensues.

[kylie_h]

Well, it's interesting to find out that Kimberley has gone by another model name before. It's entirely possible that she did these shoots after shooting with us, but it's also possible that while I do ask if a model has done any nude modelling before, that she may choose not to tell me everything. It's unfortunate if that was the case, because I genuinely thought Kimberley was keen to try her first experience for abbywinters, and of course we wouldn't want a shoot where a model says something that is not true (being a first experience, etc).

I guess this is my fault for not doing my research, but when someone tells me something, I'm inclined to believe it's true. So hopefully the explanation is that she's just done lots of work since...

[Frans]

AW is a nice start into adult I'd say, according to her tumblr she started 1-jun-2012 so it's entirely possible this was her first shoot. Yeah she has done lotsa work since then.

Kimberley really does like pets and animals, doesn't she? Having *four* horses... Masie would be so jealous No idea what 'English' means for horse jumping though, it's prolly difficult to do. Next time shoot her in a bigger room please, felt a little bit cramped Hawai sounds like a nice vacation destination yeah, can't disagree with Kimberley on that one ;-)

[mrpinkeyes]

Well the first comment of her on a forum is using the name Bree... and its commenting on a shoot she did this post was dated 12 Feb 2012...

Not impressed if she didn't give full disclosure during her pre-shoot interviews. Not knowing when the AW was actually shot I will hold off judgement for now and just say again that she looks super cute and very sexy and liked the shoot very much.

Pinky

[JacksonP49]

Well, it's interesting to find out that Kimberley has gone by another model name before. It's entirely possible that she did these shoots after shooting with us, but it's also possible that while I do ask if a model has done any nude modelling before, that she may choose not to tell me everything. It's unfortunate if that was the case, because I genuinely thought Kimberley was keen to try her first experience for abbywinters, and of course we wouldn't want a shoot where a model says something that is not true (being a first experience, etc).

I guess this is my fault for not doing my research, but when someone tells me something, I'm inclined to believe it's true. So hopefully the explanation is that she's just done lots of work since...

My bet is that it actually was her first shoot, and that it was shot very early this year.

If there's a problem, it's the silly AW policy of not asking a new model what work she's done before and why she's decided to try nude modelling. If Kimberley had been asked those things, she would have said that she wants to be a movie director, including a porn director, and that she decided to become a porn model to get enough money to start doing those things. She would also have said that she was intending to do all sorts of hardcore. She makes no secret of those things and is quite happy to blog about them. But instead all we heard was about her horses and stuff, and the shoot was not released until now, and the result is that in the meantime she's been all over the net on such choice sites as Big Mouthfuls and Real Slut Party, which is hardly girl next door stuff (not that I've looked at it).

[NeverNeverland]

AW is a nice start into adult I'd say, according to her tumblr she started 1-jun-2012 so it's entirely possible this was her first shoot. Yeah she has done lotsa work since then.

Kimberley really does like pets and animals, doesn't she? Having *four* horses... Masie would be so jealous No idea what 'English' means for horse jumping though, it's prolly difficult to do. Next time shoot her in a bigger room please, felt a little bit cramped Hawai sounds like a nice vacation destination yeah, can't disagree with Kimberley on that one ;-)

"Work" is not what I viewed her doing, that's for sure.

[cheese]

This is just a question that has been on my mind for a while now but is the fact that there is only one new model introduced each week because of a lack of models in Amsterdam or is it the new policy as when you where in Australia there used to be two or three new models a week? There is no disrespect meant here I'm just asking that is all. Tassie cheese

[remigius]

There's lots of Kimberley to be seen on ATK under the name Bree. Having said that I did enjoy her AW shoot, particularly the video. I was so busy watching her that I didn't notice it was shot in the area of a postage stamp!

xx

[tjsunray]

All i can say is...regardless of what ( or how many ) other sites Kimberly appears in, the way she represents herself here, in her debut shoot for AW's, IS the perfect Girl next door model, that is good enough for me. (and you got to love those natural eye brows ) There was enough material covered in her interview to give us a glimpse of her personality, interests, hobbies and personally and i'd rather not know and have her tell me of her porno history. My only regret is, there wasn't enough of Kimberly...i hope she returns and covers the whole gamut of AW's shoots.

J.O.P.W.H.O ( Just One Person With His Opinion )

[trebor]

After reading this thread I was curious about the other sites Kimberley has modeled for. Seeing her on some of those creepy sites reminds me just how different and special Abby Winters is, particularly in regards to the respect shown to the women who model here. The way Kimberley is presented here is a million times sexier than what I glimpsed on some of the other borderline abusive sites she has modeled for.

[kylie_h]

If there's a problem, it's the silly AW policy of not asking a new model what work she's done before and why she's decided to try nude modelling.

I take it you mean during the shoot?

[NeverNeverland]

Just is my luck, though, that there appears a girl on AW that is so very attractive to me in a girl-next-door way, and she ends up having been in some very raunchy videos. Like it or not, fantasy is en element of how we (can't be just me) view these girls posing nude. For me, one of AW's main draws is the belief that these young women aren't pros and porn stars, but rather, girls who simply had a desire to pose their naked beauty, without resorting to hardcore activity.

And I am not judging the women who do work in porn, either.

But for me the most attractive elements in a female relate to her sense of dignity, self-respect and wholesome sexuality.

Maybe I'm just a prude.

[JacksonP49]

I take it you mean during the shoot?

Both before and during, really.

Abby Winters is supposed to be an amateur site (I think so, anyway, although it's getting a little hard to tell), so I would have expected all new models to be asked about their previous experience and their reasons for deciding to model nude.

I don't know how much of that happened with Kimberley, especially considering she wasn't shot in-house, but in America, by an external photographer.

If a model is asked those questions before the shoot and it turns out that she's had a lot of previous experience, or that she's never done it before but she's made a decision to make a career in porn, then I think that that's something that members of an amateur site are entitled to know.

The easy way to make sure that the members know is by asking the model about them during the shoot, and the members could then hear her answers from her. Also, as I've said before once or twice, I think they're things that would be of interest to many members. (They were often asked about pre-Amsterdam.)

If AW knows that a model is highly experienced and/or a new or established professional porn model, then I think that it would be misleading for the site, which is supposed to be amateur, to withhold that information from the members.

[Edit]
I'm adding this edit, Kylie, because I re-read the above and realised that it sounded a bit different from the way I intended.

I know you asked Kimberly whether this was her first shoot and she said it was and that she was keen to try Abby Winters as her first step. Depending on when you spoke to her, that may well have been true. I don't see why she would have lied to you.

What I don't know is whether you asked her, or she told her, that she was intending this to be the first step in a full-scale professional porn career, including hardcore, or what she told you, if anything, about why she was doing it. But I do think that that's the sort of question that should normally be asked in the pre-shoot interview, and also in the shoot itself. I think it's part of being open and honest with the members, who have signed up to an amateur site.

[redlabka]

For me the most important is to be able to trust the informations given by AW.

It doesn't really matter if a model is an amateur or not (specially when the models are as beautiful as Kimberley or Alyssa R) but I want to know it.

When AW tries to hide the truth about a model (by lie or omission), it reduces the trust that I have in the website.
I ask myself what else AW is also hiding.
Can I keep trusting AW for what really matters? natural and healthy girls, choice of posing levels, relaxed shoots...

[AarontheMoor]

I guess this is my fault for not doing my research, but when someone tells me something, I'm inclined to believe it's true.

You can't blame yourself; she used an alias! Unless you viewed all Internet porn, had some very sophisticated software, or hired an investigator, how could you ever know for sure? In any case, it doesn't matter. If the model does an effective job of creating the illusion of innocence, that's what AW subscribers are after. And the few AW subscribers who view enough porn to to recognize her from somewhere else consume lots of porn and will get over it quickly enough. All who believe that busloads of shy innocent girl next door types decide on a whim to do explicit modeling for a web site are just fooling themselves.

[AarontheMoor]

duplicate post

[edonardo]

i'm very blasted

http://www.indexxx.com/models/67124/jodi-taylor/