New After Dark Solo: Angie
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New After Dark Solo: Angie
Collapse
X
-
I really like this dramatic lighting scene. I just wish the lighting would be from the front & top. I guess the chair would not be visible and lighting would sputter off her features which is impossible with Angie.
Note to photographers: try shooting in a long & narrow alley way (this will give it a lot of depth), or a balcony of a performance theater in rehearsal, especially if its a girl-girl shot after dark.
Comment
-
Faulty video
Why is the bottom half of the video missing. Whoever shot the vid should be sacked. And whoever decided to offer this for sale should also be sacked. It doesn't do the sites reputation any good putting out substandard offerings like this. I have been cheated.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jasbartay View PostWhy is the bottom half of the video missing. Whoever shot the vid should be sacked. And whoever decided to offer this for sale should also be sacked. It doesn't do the sites reputation any good putting out substandard offerings like this. I have been cheated.As I wrote in the post directly above yours, video issue is known and has been reported to staff. If you still feel cheated after issue has been looked into feel free to contact customer-service for a refund (I'm guessing you bought this as pay-per-shoot ??).
p.s. notice that the free preview also has the lower-half black, previews are useful things.. just saying
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frans View PostHi Jasbartay, still positive as ever I seeAs I wrote in the post directly above yours, video issue is known and has been reported to staff. If you still feel cheated after issue has been looked into feel free to contact customer-service for a refund (I'm guessing you bought this as pay-per-shoot ??).
p.s. notice that the free preview also has the lower-half black, previews are useful things.. just saying
At least with the Giselle Theresa vid AW only made it available at a later date. This time it was unacceptable for it not to have been noticed BEFORE putting it up. But you seem to think it is acceptable for standards to be lowered. And we should all just accept them.
This vid was not of merchantable quality, and rather than dig at me, perhaps a measure of humility on your part should have been the order of the day.
As for your comment about it being a pay per shoot purchase, I'm wondering why you would even mention this? I can only assume that in your mind you believe this would be somehow second class?
Finally, as a fan of Angie, any comments made by me are borne from disappointment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jasbartay View PostAs for your comment about it being a pay per shoot purchase, I'm wondering why you would even mention this? I can only assume that in your mind you believe this would be somehow second class?.
Did you view the stills? Did you like 'm ? It's definitely a different look at Angie compared to her other shoots.
Comment
-
Hey guys, just popping in to let you all know that a sexy team of scantily clad IT geeks are hard at work getting this data encoded properly. To explain, the raw video is as good as ever, but for one reason or another, somewhere between the camera and the website, something went wrong.
We get that it is frustrating, and are sorry for any disappointment. All will be set straigh soon- when you've got over 1000 hours of video, every now and then something is bound to go wrong. The best we can do is get right to fixing it. Cheers!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brent View PostHey guys, just popping in to let you all know that a sexy team of scantily clad IT geeks are hard at work getting this data encoded properly. To explain, the raw video is as good as ever, but for one reason or another, somewhere between the camera and the website, something went wrong.
We get that it is frustrating, and are sorry for any disappointment. All will be set straigh soon- when you've got over 1000 hours of video, every now and then something is bound to go wrong. The best we can do is get right to fixing it. Cheers!
As for 1000 hours of video, I guess I've got it all. Having been with the site, in various guises, since probably year 2, I know how good the material is. The Giselle Theresa mis-shoot was a disappointment, and I was concerned this Angie shoot was going the same way. That the original shoot seems to be OK means I can look forward to seeing Angie at her best.
And, yes, Frans, I did catch the stills. And you must understand how they whetting the appetite led to such disappointment.
Anyway, the last two GG shoots have been amazing. I don't think AW has ever been better. KUTGW.
BTW Frans, as far as pay per view is concerned, I would happily pay twice as much for the video shoots. I realise that the site needs to be properly funded, and am happy to support it.
Comment
-
Not to be too impatient but have you got a provisional date for when this video will be reuploaded? I was really looking forward to seeing this one
Comment
-
Originally posted by DarianbloodNot to be too impatient but have you got a provisional date for when this video will be reuploaded? I was really looking forward to seeing this one
yusa
Comment
-
-
Comment