Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Good things about natural girls (or not!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Good things about natural girls (or not!)

    Right OK, I know I went bloody crazy tonight, this is my third thread. However I will take tomorrow off from posting at all (SF hears the sighs of relief echoing all over the site and shouts of "get off the boards then you Limey tosser"!). I'm just in a good mood for various reasons and nothing good on TV tonight!

    This is further to Gldnrtrvr's thoughts on the Jillian and Tamsin thread. For me it is nice to see a natural girl in these days of shaving everything! Now I am not a 'hair fetishist' and I am not trying to find a girl/woman who is closer to a monkey! I mainly just like to see pubic hair on a girl, not so bothered about elsewhere. But shaved everything becomes so common that now I actually do like seeing some hair in other places occasionally. Slightly hairy forearms, a little 'treasure trail' leading up to the belly button from down below and even in summer, some underarm hair. It is not just about a change or the girl/woman growing hair because someone wants them to. I don't like girls shaving just cos they think its what someone else wants or being pressured to, so I would be a hypocrite to demand they grow the hair out for my own or others' preference. Also some sites are silly in that they deliberately get the girl to grow as much body hair as possible to make it into some kind of 'fetish site'. No what I find sexy is just girls that are comfortable in themselves, comfortable having hair where its supposed to be and defying what societal convention says they should look like. By all means I would not want a girl/woman to feel uncomfortable or undesireable, so trim, tidy up whatever body hair you feel necessary to look confident. But unless its really messy or there's just too much then what's the problem? To me a female with shaven parts all over is not that much more appealing than a girl with hairs sprouting everywhere.

    Anyway I digress again, I am just a guy who always likes seeing a nice bush on a young adult woman and who is not disgusted or repelled in any way by hairy forearms, some armpit hair from time to time etc. Most importantly I find natural women attractive who are comfortable in themselves (not having been told either way to shave or not) but who realise that their body hair is sexy to many more men than they would realise.

    Anyway my last thread and last post for a day or so (unless someone really tempts me). Just wanted to get some input from people who also think 'natural' girls and body hair (either just in a certain place or in many different ones) is sexy. Of course you are welcome also to speak out if you don't like a girl having hair in a certain place but this thread is certainly not about insulting or slagging off 'natural girls'. If you don't like them, which some guys I know don't, then just resist the temptation or give a good reason why you don't like a particular part being hairy. Just to discuss the good points (and maybe the odd dislike) about girls and their 'hair'. Mainly a celebration though, I am a bit biased I guess, sorry bout that.

    SF

    #2
    IMO......

    I agree that it's frustrating that liking anything other than bladness from the neck down is regarded as a 'fetish' by just about any source of porn. It's not the only 'natural' thing to be stigmatised in porn...it happens to anyone who wants to see 40-year-olds, black women, women with scars, ejaculation anywhere other than on a face: just about anything that photoshop can remove.

    I guess I'm not really commenting helpfully, lol, just adding my voice to the chorus.

    Comment


      #3
      I think your comment was "helpful," Stilton! It's very easy to take those porn conventions for granted, and interesting to be challenged with stuff outside the norm. But 40-somethings, black women, women with scars - oh my GAWD! they're all really GROSS! And where else is ejactulate supposed to go? don't all chicks love it when you come on their face? just kidding. img tag disable, use attachment mgr/system to add images to postshttp://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif

      The argument has been made that a completely shaven woman is pre-pubescent and those men who like that look are paedophiles. The argument has also been made that women with lots of bodyhair are masculine and those men who like that look are gay. Neither argument is valid, of course. It's a look, that's it. I don't attach any extra meaning to it... my gf for a long time didn't shave anything and I really liked it - soft, sensual, untamed, intriguing, and risque. I see an armpit as a very erotic and erogenous zone, since it so seldom sees the light of day (like other places). Leaving it unshaven makes me think even more about its similarity to the happy place between the legs.

      A bald (or worse, stubbly) pussy looks to me like something's missing. It's like what it looks like after taking the clothes off a mannequin. Or a Barbie doll. (wait - you say taking clothes off barbie dolls is not a turn-on for most guys... er.. ah... hmmm img tag disable, use attachment mgr/system to add images to postshttp://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif ) It's not a very inviting place to me if it's shaved - it looks vulnerable, cold, sterile, and sore (particularly with the ingrown hairs that often result). An unshaved pussy looks comfortable and cozy. It also says a lot about the woman sporting it, and I happen to be enough of a man-feminist to think that a woman feeling pressured to adjusting her look, particularly in areas only one or two people will see with any frequency, is at the least silly and at the most a caving to the desires of "most" men (though I'm thinking that those men are simply the most vocal).

      But SF has a very real and valid point that any man-feminist wouldn't pressure a woman to do anything at all - if she wants to shave (hygeine, she likes the look, tidiness, odor reduction - a myth, etc.) then she should do it. Comfort with one's own bodies. I would take a healthy confident large woman with a couple of hairs around her nipples, an unusual birthmark, no make-up, and two different colored eyes over Pamela Anderson or other anatomically incorrect hi-heel-wearing-during-g/g-porn cyborg.

      Well, that should stir the pot a bit. These are, it goes without saying, my humble opinions. Who the heck knows why we're attracted to certain things or people. It's one of the greatest unsolved mysteries of humanity, and I say we leave it unsolved...

      GldnRtrvr

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by Gldnrtrvr
        [B]...and I happen to be enough of a man-feminist to think that a woman feeling pressured to adjusting her look, particularly in areas only one or two people will see with any frequency, is at the least silly and at the most a caving to the desires of "most" men (though I'm thinking that those men are simply the most vocal).
        I think you should be careful to not underestimate the need of people to feel accepted in society. It's not silly or caving, it's just a shame that mass media has so much power over people to make them feel bad about their bodies if they do not conform.

        abby

        Comment


          #5
          Hi

          Firstly good points Stilton, it is shocking that some of these things would be regarded as fetishes. Its OK them being put into categories if people particularly like them but not fetishes. If there is going to be a category for hairy for example, then shaved should also be in there. If you're gonna put black women there then there should be a category white women? Well anyway reason I loved Naomi L was not just cos she is 'exotic', its cos she is gorgeous, has the most fantastic smile and came across as really bubbly on the video. Yes her darker skin was attractive to me but I liked her for the same reasons that I like other girls on the site, its not a fetish.

          Anyway back to the main topic, Abby above makes a very valid point. The mass media does have too much power. Porn would now be included in my view cos of the number who look at it on the internet! I just don't feel it is sending out a healthy message to either young men or young women. I worry that young men will think this is what young women "should" look like and the girls themselves will think this is how they "have to" look, to be accepted. So though I am cool with more guys and gals using porn to explore fantasies/sexuality and aid sex life, I sometimes worry about the actual material they are presented with. I'd be much happier if it was the kind of pictures or videos here at AW.com or at ISM!

          I do get angry also at the attitude of some people though! I think this is another point of pressure. I had a look through a few of the messages left on the "post yourself" couples or 'voyeur' sites as they're called. Many men were actually loving the 'hairy bush' and were just complimentary but then there were a few people who were just downright nasty saying things like "shave it" or "get with the program its 2003!" etc etc. Like who gives them the right or authority?

          Anyway I don't mind that there are some men who prefer shaved or even some girls/women who prefer to shave themselves. But at no point should there be pressure or it considered the norm! I don't mind having categories with both shaven as well as hairy. My point is that there is a vast imbalance! Everywhere I look in porn, shaven etc, there just needs to be more of a balance, to better reflect reality. Not every girl/woman looks like that and there are plenty of us who love 'natural'. Sites like AW.com send out a much more positive message, its just more natural, relaxed, girls being themselves. And sending out the message that, yes, these young girls have pubic hair in real life and they're damn sexy at the same time. The fightback had to start on sites like this. The positive message goes out to the people viewing the pics and hopefully the girls themselves get the feedback that indeed loads of us love them the way they are, with sexy body hair. Same with Project ISM where the girls present themselves as they want. Its a big battle you fight with the mass media but I hope that there will be a point where liking 'natural' girls/women is regarded as the norm and that its actually the shaven look that is more of a 'fetish' (it is these girls who are being asked or pressured to change their looks, not girls like the ones here on AW).

          And I don't know of any sexy girl here (like the lovely Simone or foxy Zana), who didn't look even sexier when I did seem them again with 'hair down below' (having originally posed shaven here). Just seemed complete in their sexyness and appeal.

          SF

          PS Anyway remember this thread is also about a celebration of what we do like about natural girls, their body hair etc etc, when and where we find it sexy.img tag disable, use attachment mgr/system to add images to postshttp://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/happy.gif

          Comment


            #6
            Sorry to bang on about ISM which is an absolute gem of a site, but today's model "polly_gun" is sporting a marvellous unfettered growler. Excellent, so real you can almost smell it.

            Comment


              #7
              Wow Roops, Polly is superb! Along with Andrea (where do you keep finding these blonde Canadian girls : remember Morgan anyone?), two very sexy girls on ISM and AW respectively. Both girls very sexy and sporting 'hair'. Perfect way to go into the weekend.

              Remember as I said above, as well as bemoaning the attitude to 'natural' girls in the porn world, we can also share what we like about them! And this thread can also serve a public service function as we continue to try and find out from our own experiences :

              Do lesbians tend not to shave, compared to other women? Are most of the girls/women we have had the pleasure to see in more intimate circumstances, natural and hairy, giving these porn barons some pause for thought as to the realism/representivity of their shoots? Both questions we have been exploring on other threads but which we could move here, so as not to get too off topic elsewhere.

              SF

              Comment


                #8
                Ah! In no way did I mean that I condemned women who do shave. To many, it makes sense for a number of different reasons (conforming to society is one). Heck, if I didn't conform to society, I suppose I'd wear my bathrobe to work. It is very comfy. I'm just impressed by those who choose not to shave - but a woman can be mondo sexy (though to me not AS sexy) shaved.

                Abby, I think I'm going to move to Australia, given what I've seen on this site. You should get some commission from the Austraila Department of Tourism and Immigration for attracting people to your fair continent-country. I mean, I look at the "Upcoming Models," and they are all at least an 8 or 9 in my book. I mean, Matilda and her freckles - hot. Lori and her cool arm scar - hot. Paula's face - maybe the most pleasant beautiful face I've ever seen on a woman without any clothes on (and a nice bush too) - hot. Hannah's red hair (a true redhead clearly!) - hot. Fleur's nice furry pussy and taint - hot.

                OK - back on thread here - I'd like to hear from those who like vids of women shaving each other. I wonder if that's something that lesbians ever do, or if it's purely a fantasy of guys out there.

                I'd also like to hear opinions about cunnilingus and hairy/shaved options. Nothing to me is cooler that burying my face in a full bush and breathing in deeply through my nose as it's being surrounded by long soft hair. Ladies? Is cunnilingus more comfortable if you are clean-shaven?

                In a related thought, I'm also into "flaws" on a woman's body. I put that in quotes the same way I'd but "sexy" in quotes - it's all a matter of perspective. For example, Jodie Foster (hot) has this cool little spot in her eye. A good friend of mine had this shock of hair on the back of her head that would grow completely white hair (a la Rogue in X-Men) - hot. Moles, little sprouts of hair, a scar or two, a birthmark... nothing too unusual or distracting, but stuff that would otherwise be airbrushed out (or concealed by make-up). Stuff that sets you apart. Makes you unique. All exciting. Anyone with me?

                GR

                Comment


                  #9
                  Mainstream porn is about the impersonal, objectified body. It is not about personality or individuality -- thats what makes AW so wonderful.
                  One of the reasons that Porn Stars shave all or most of their pubes is probably probably precisly the same reason that many of us do not want real lovers to shave.
                  Do you really think that people really want to be smelling each others bits on the set of "Blond and Boned 4"??
                  I'm sure they shave/wax, douche, enema and gargle before a scene.

                  Timbit

                  Comment


                    #10
                    I'm intrigued by Roops site recommendation for full bushes. Can you please tell me the how to access the site you refer to as 'ism".

                    Thanks.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Hi Venusman and others, ISM is short for www.IShotMyself.com. The basic premise is the model takes photos of herself and she has to physically be touching the shutter release. It's a site organized by Abby Winters collaborator Elvaar so you'll see lots of AW models there -- especially in the early sets when Abby was seriously helping him incubate it.

                      It's a pretty interesting site. Since so many of the models are the same the basic hair-to-hairless ratios aren't that different. But the photographs are taken from a much more intimate perspective than Abby's likely to get (especially if, like most photographers, she uses a fairly long lens to give the model a little more space.) That means that you probably get a closer look at various naughty bits and that means unless they shave you may see quite a bit more hair.

                      I would add, however, that in this case "closer" rarely translates as "better" or more "complete." The camera angles and viewing areas are largely dependent on the length of the model's arms, which can limit the field somewhat. Also the models are pretty much shooting blind. You can't really see much more than toes through the viewfinder so most of the pictures are taken on faith. The results overall are very different and often very lovely. And often the model gets clever with the use of toes or mirrors to increase the field of view. Some of these shots approach studio quality, though naturally there can be flare from the flash.

                      The thing I liked most about the sets were the way the model gets to decide where and how she'll present herself. I also like the different way the modesl seemed to react when it was just her and a camera, compared to how she might react to the whole photographer-plus-crew-plus-potential-worldwide-audience. The shots seem a lot more intimate and for-herself. Sometimes they're goofy and self-conscious but just as often they look quite excited.

                      I haven't been back for a look since the complementary/introductory subscriptions ran out (been too busy) but the quality of both the pictures and the site's interface design were improving daily. Definitely worth a second look though.

                      figleaf

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by Talkingfigleaf
                        [B]I also like the different way the modesl seemed to react when it was just her and a camera, compared to how she might react to the whole photographer-plus-crew-plus-potential-worldwide-audience.
                        That's something that surprises us, too. Sometimes Abby will be looking at an ISM shoot of a model she just photographed herself, and sees that, despite her refusing to open her legs for Abby's camera, she goes full on super-duper explicit for ISM. It actually happens quite a lot, too!

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Yep, strange that! But again as I say I think the two sites serve different functions. Here I find that Abby's photos are a nice mix of full body and more close up shots, of explicit and not so explicit shoots. The sets are always beautifully done and however explicit, they always seem to be tasteful and provide a complete portrayal of the model which does her justice. ISM shoots are more raw. The shots are obviously not as quality and the girl is slightly more limited in the angles she can get. However a lot of the girls find imaginative ways to get round that. Again their personality can show itself in the ISM shoots because they are choosing how to present themselves.

                          I like both and think they compliment each other, despite the fact you don't cross promote. Do sometimes find myself thinking though, why didn't you do that for Abby, why didn't you have your pubic hair in Abby's shoot etc etc? But equally I also see some of these non-AW models like Polly_Gun with all her 'hair' and think "I wish she would shoot for AW" because I'd love to see her shot in Abby's glorious style! Even with the models here who 'won't open their legs', the shoots are very sexily done, so its rarely a problem really.

                          SF

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Dear figleaf,

                            Thanks for the reply and the detailed info. I plan on checking the site out. I think I do remember the announcement a few months back but totally forgot about it.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              My passion is for 'natural' 'down below'.... Perhaps oddly,....I don't mind one way or another about body hair in other areas. :0/

                              Cap'n. img tag disable, use attachment mgr/system to add images to postshttp://www.abbywinters.com/discus/clipart/smile.gif

                              Comment


                                #16
                                I'm with you Capt'n, its the lovely pubes that count! Having said that I do like a lot of the girls on ISM who just let it grow in different places, they look sexy and I am turned on by their total confidence in doing what they themselves want to with their body. Also I do tend to find slightly furry forearms on a girl quite attractive also.

                                But the 'upside down triangle' is, as you say, the most sexy of all for me. Call me a 'hair' fetishist if you want, I just like seeing a bit of 'hair' in these places cos its refreshing and different and nonconformist in these times. Not silly hairy, not moustache, just nicely hairy.

                                PS We shall be indebted to you Capt'n for introducing your five point scales on 'amount of pubic hair', 'breast size' etc. hehe.

                                SF

                                Comment


                                  #17
                                  When Cap'n said he doesn't "mind one way or another about body hair in other areas", one thing came to mind.

                                  I *do* mind hairy legs. It's one of the very few things that can immediately turn me off to a model, no matter how pretty the rest of her is.
                                  I'll defend to the death her right to "go natural" that way, but... eccchh. Wear opaque stockings.

                                  Arsby

                                  Comment


                                    #18
                                    Arsby -

                                    good! Glad to hear a dissenting opinion. Very interesting about your aversion to hairy legs. I ask this in a purely academic, non-judgemental way: do you have any idea why you think hairy legs are so eccccchhy? With what do you associate hairy legs? Do you think they look unclean? Do you object to the way you think they might feel? Do women look more feminine with clean-shaven legs? Younger? I know that by leading you this way it may seem like I object to your opinion - but quite the contrary - I hope you (and others) will answer honestly to promote a dialogue.

                                    I don't mean to get too Sigmund Freud here, but it fascinates me that many folks find (leg and pit, or even pubic) hair such a turn-off, and conversely why I (and others) find it such a turn-on. In my pop psychoanalysis of myself, I was a small child in the early 70s and had three older (teenage) sisters whom I adored. My favorite (the oldest) is a redhead with lots of freckles, and to this day, that's the look that really attracts me. They were also hippies. To me, the smell of Patchouli and the sight of hairy legs, arms, and pits, and no make-up, gets me going. I think there is a connection. I'm also the youngest of six children - only two of us were boys - so in my upbringing, I had a lot of strong women whom I really admired and respected. Or it might simply be genetic and innate, like I think homosexuality is.

                                    I don't think that men or women who enjoy clean-shaven women are wrong. They (you) simply have a different opinion of what is sexy than I do... maybe I should go into psychology, but I'd be very interested to hear from folks who find hairiness a turn-off - it will help us all understand and hopefully reserve judgement against those who disagree (not that that's a problem in these chat rooms)...

                                    GR

                                    Comment


                                      #19
                                      Hard to say, Gr.

                                      Remember, we're talking legs only, here. I don't mind a hairy pussy (kinda like it), mustache, hairy pits (not too hairy, please), hairy arms, hairs around the nipples. Hairy knuckles. Hairy toes. All okay. It's just the hairy legs that are a major turnoff.

                                      I was a teen in the 60's, 20-something in the 70's, and hung with the hippy chicks for awhile. Maybe even hung with your sisters! Didn't like hairy legs back then, don't now.

                                      It may be as simple as hairy legs look masculine to me. I see enough hairy legs on guys in the gym.

                                      It's certainly not that hairy legs = rough, because from first-hand experience I found that hairy legs are smoother than stubbly ones.

                                      I think it's genetic. I can't think of any way I could have learned not to like hairy legs on a girl.

                                      Arsby

                                      Comment


                                        #20
                                        Hi

                                        Well personally I think you might be right about the masculinity of hairy legs. I don't mind in some cases (see certain ISM models) but generally I'm not so keen, just like moustache or facial hair and hairy chest area. Probably because they seem male traits. That's what I meant by not silly amounts (like they do sometimes on samples I saw from ATK Natural and Hairy, as if liking any hair on a female is a fetish which should be shoved in its own category!)

                                        Its great we all like different things and you're right, it probably is genetic and healthy. BUT : I still think the point stands that the media, porn industry are not as healthy an influence as far as pressure and the way they portray women with body hair and more often without! The imbalance does need to be addressed. Liking different styles, types of woman is fine but 'natural' women need to be shown as just that 'natural' and beautiful.

                                        Anyway I will continue to stick by and support sites with sexy girls with pubic hair, looking really lovely without modifications, like many of the girls here! However I do get turned on sometimes by hair in other places. Taking some examples of the girls here : I often find slightly hairy forearms quite nice (a la Belinda). Also underarm hair can also be quite attractive (some girls on ISM and Violet to name one AW model). Certain girls just seem to suit it and I think its just a personal preference. Personally I think if you were turned off these incredibly sexy girls by that factor alone, it is you who misses out cos there are plenty of us who appreciate them the way they are and for what they are.

                                        Who knows? Maybe if very hairy women were everywhere, I wouldn't be so aroused by it. But I don't think hair in the 3 areas I just mentioned is in anyway nasty or manly and I like it. I thank goodness that sites like AW.com and ISM show girls with some individuality. To show that girls can be very sexy with 'hair' and that its perfectly normal to have. Forgive me if I just love girls the way they were 'designed', natural breasts, body hair and all! Hopefully girls on sites like this and elsewhere get to know there are lots of us out here. I certainly would not ever want to make a woman feel rotten or self conscious about her body. Variety is the spice of life is it not?

                                        SF

                                        Comment


                                          #21
                                          Funny thing about hair. A lot of people don't mind leg hair but get totally grossed out by armpit hair. I think it's quite sexy now, generally because the women who grow it are, as Sweatyfox points out, are often the most confident about themselves and what they're doing.

                                          As for pubic hair I'd prefer completely untrimmed to recently shaved but given a choice (it's not my body so not likely, eh?) I prefer lightly trimmed to either all or nothing.

                                          figleaf

                                          Comment


                                            #22
                                            Thought I'd add my tuppennyworth.

                                            Hairy pussies, hairy armpits, hairy natal clefts, downy forearms, all of these appeal to me, sometimes to a great extent depending on my mood and the girl in question. On the other hand, similarly to Arsby, anything more than the most gauzy translucent fluff on a woman's legs and I'm turned off in a big way. I don't know why this should be, but I suspect it may be because I perceive leg hair as very masculine. What is inexplicable is why I don't perceive hair on other bodily parts - such as the armpits - as masculine, when other men appear to.

                                            At the same time, if the fancy strikes me, I can be quite excited by fully shaved pudenda as long as it is very cleanly done. What I can't abide, is razor burn, shaving spots, pimply stubble etc. (in fact anything that looks more like a man's neck than a woman's most intimate parts).

                                            Comment


                                              #23
                                              Yep TFL, the confidence and being comfortable with the way they are, is the sexy thing. I don't question too much why I like seeing 'hair' in these places, I just am glad I can appreciate girls like the ones here, exactly as they are. If they feel good about themselves, that makes me feel good too.

                                              Also as you say, I prefer full bush 'down below' but if the girl/woman feels the need to trim/tidy, thats cool too, however she feels comfortable. I would prefer trimmed as long as its still hairy!

                                              SF

                                              Comment


                                                #24
                                                I just recently started dating a lovely girl who does not shave her legs. She'd shave her armpits for hygenic reasons, but nothing else. She told me once that a (male) schoolmate told her that she'd never ever get a boyfriend unless she shaved her legs. The first time I saw her bare legs was at a party; I told her, in front of everyone in the room, how impressed I was that she didn't shave.
                                                We've been going out since that night. She's the first girlfriend I ever had with hairy legs. I've had girlfirends who didn't shave their underarms, and none shaved their pubic hair, but she's the first not to shave her legs. And I think it's cool beyond cool.

                                                For the record: underarm hair is a strong aphrodisiac for me. I enjoy hairy legs and shaven legs, but not stubbly legs. And pubic hair is is not only erotic, it is requisite — no matter how beautiful a woman is, no matter how sexy the rest of her body is, a shaven pussy turns me off almost instantly.

                                                Consider: the only time a woman's pussy is naturally hairless is when she's a prepubescent girl. Anybody here find that erotic?
                                                I know I don't.

                                                Comment


                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Dafydd
                                                  [B]I just recently started dating a lovely girl who does not shave her legs. She'd shave her armpits for hygenic reasons, but nothing else. She told me once that a (male) schoolmate told her that she'd never ever get a boyfriend unless she shaved her legs. The first time I saw her bare legs was at a party; I told her, in front of everyone in the room, how impressed I was that she didn't shave.
                                                  We've been going out since that night. She's the first girlfriend I ever had with hairy legs. I've had girlfirends who didn't shave their underarms, and none shaved their pubic hair, but she's the first not to shave her legs. And I think it's cool beyond cool.

                                                  For the record: underarm hair is a strong aphrodisiac for me. I enjoy hairy legs and shaven legs, but not stubbly legs. And pubic hair is is not only erotic, it is requisite — no matter how beautiful a woman is, no matter how sexy the rest of her body is, a shaven pussy turns me off almost instantly.

                                                  Consider: the only time a woman's pussy is naturally hairless is when she's a prepubescent girl. Anybody here find that erotic?
                                                  I know I don't.

                                                  I'm with you on this! The 'frozen chicken' look does nothing for me at all!

                                                  Cap'n.

                                                  Comment


                                                    #26
                                                    Talking of natural girls, the lovely Miranda has just posted under a different name on Project ISM message board (about the set she did there)! Dunno 'bout you but I am missing her here and think we must try to coax her back on. Anyone who is a member of the ISM site also (Roops?), we need to give gorgeous Miranda a subtle hint to jump back here and speak to us. Come to think of it since sexy Tammy is 'goes live' next week, I hope she'll come back as well! I can't wait until Elise posts again also. Well here's hoping!

                                                    By the way, great day for bush lovers no? Kasey and Roberta sets. Both really fine young ladies and sexy in different ways.

                                                    SF

                                                    Comment


                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Sweatyfox
                                                      [B]Anyone who is a member of the ISM site also (Roops?), we need to give gorgeous Miranda a subtle hint to jump back here and speak to us.
                                                      Indeed I am a member and have been from the start. (Abby, I've received the brown package with the agreed contents, so I will carry on with the endorsement, Mum's the word now) At £5.99 (UK Sterling) per month this is a genuine bargain. 30 to 100 photos of a different amateur model EVERY day - you can't get better than that ! If you're a complete philistine (like me) and don't go for the "conceptual art" stuff, this is still has some excellent porn. Some days are a disappointment like yesterday where by coicidence we had Allanah_R under the guise of "Stella" doing a self-shoot titled "rubber ducky" - very stern she was, unlike the aw.com version. Her shoot should have been titled "101 ways to shoot my own tits". However today we had everything - pretty girl, unfettered bush and explicitness.

                                                      As for giving Miranda a subtle hint I'm afraid to disappoint you as I generally don't join in on the "speak with the models" board. Basically I am a shy guy and would end up stammering.

                                                      Comment

                                                      Subscribe to our e-mail newsletter

                                                       
                                                      Sign up for the abby newsletter. Don't worry, we'll NEVER share your email address with anyone.
                                                      Working...
                                                      X