I love AW.COM, but I also like to see girls having sex with boys. I know Abby doesn't really have an interest in shooting this (although when she has it's been top notch), so I'm not going to bug her about it. However, I'd love to hear reccomendations from other members on where to get more like what Abby has done, or sites that have a similar vibe to AW.COM but with real cocks (as opposed to the plastic type).
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Where do you go for your hetero-hard-core needs?
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Originally posted by stoneyyyThat site Gerza is much like this and don't seem to have b/g that Silver is looking for
If people want a taste of GOW, then the archive of the news page appears to be browsable to non-members here. There are certainly several hetero shoots to be seen. (And a Matilda and Selina GG - I really may have to rejoin!)
I don't subscribe to any sites that match Silvertone's criteria so I can't add much. I am sceptical that such a site exists.
Comment
-
Originally posted by pjay...I am sceptical that such a site exists.
Obviously, there are places to get some amateur shots that sometimes do that trick, including newbienudes.com and a French site, www.jacquieetmichel.net, which are both free. (The French site has an annoying pop-up when you close it, but there's something about the site I like nevertheless.) And I liked the handful of self-shot series on I Shot Myself, but they aren't frequent enough given the price. Someone mentioned GOW, which I liked too, but not enough to stay a member.
I did run across one site -- can't remember the name -- which claimed to be an amateur couples site with better than average photography, but I don't think it was what it claimed. The guys were just too perfect looking to be real.
Mostly, when I'm in the mood for something like this and want the best, I revisit Annabel or Jamie's shoots with their lovers (or that French couple). I always find some new shot I hadn't noticed. And I wait for some couple to come along that Abby, or maybe Penelope since she's shooting now, find irresistible.
Comment
-
I normally have little interest in explicit b/g sex and I don't particularly care for videos.
That being said...
I'm a denizen of the newsgroups, and I just happened to find a series of b/g vids that I like! They're from Colorclimax.com. The girls are very cute and natural-looking, and most are unshaven below. The guys are a little smarmy looking, but attractive and well-built. The sex is pretty varied, and there are some nice closeup scenes. The quality isn't too hot, but they're .mp4's that have pretty good compression, viewable on Quicktime player. If you know about usenet (the newsgroups), look for a group that has the word "aubergine" in it.
Comment
-
Hey Jseas, thanks for the pointer to the French site!!!!!!.
I’m a member of GOW because apart from enjoying the forums, the site makes a point of supplying a small but regular amount of b/g stuff. Now and then there is performance anxiety but this shows how real the people are. Also refreshing to see are guys with normal size cocks instead of the usual porn sized male organ. Funnily enough Annie, the owner of GOW was recently pondering about the amount of b/g stuff she should have on her site. So far the response from members has been positive. I always though that is was a great shame that Abby lost her appetite in showing b/g.
GOW forum members will know of my unofficial campaign to show real sex in porn, that is real couples doing real sex. I have no interest in the standard porn industry type of b/g shoots where all men have large dicks and always end up shooting their loads externally. I guess that’s why sites such as newbie nudes are so popular though even there, the external sperm shot happens in the majority of cases.
Pjay, I would agree that GOW is sluttier, its also “trash with panache” in the Russ Meyer/John Waters style.
Sorry for rambling a bit, I’m monitoring the children’s homework hour and cooking their tea at the same time!!! Supermum, eh??!!!!!!!
Comment
-
I liked the handful of self-shot series on I Shot Myself, but they aren't frequent enough given the price.
Got a link to this GOW site?
The best hardcore site I can think of is http://www.atkingdom.com/
It's a bit glam for my liking - I prefer their natural and hairy site
Comment
-
Originally posted by doggieThe best hardcore site I can think of is http://www.atkingdom.com/
It's a bit glam for my liking - I prefer their natural and hairy site
Of all the hardcore I've come across on the web, this did seem to be the best of the lot, and as Abby says in her recommendation, there is a lot of content so chances are everyone will find something to their liking there.
Comment
-
-
Already in the thread.
These guys are a bunch of cunts, regularly ripping off us, and many other sites. No way are we going to give them publicity.
All contributions to the site I referred to are made by amateurs themselves - it's a wifeswap/swingers kind of site.
In two years of subscribing I can honestly say I have never ever seen any AW material on there - it would stick out like a sore thumb
Comment
-
Originally posted by doggieIn two years of subscribing I can honestly say I have never ever seen any AW material on there - it would stick out like a sore thumb
The problem is they don't think to check to see if it's genuine, they just assume all contributions are honest. As they are making a profit from the site, they have an obligation to do some research, or at the least be more proactive in correcting mistakes.
Comment
-
The problem is they don't think to check to see if it's genuine, they just assume all contributions are honest
Having said all that - the first time I saw AW material was on a site that gathers pictures from file sharing newsgroups - now those people were definitely ripping people's stuff off, but, it exposed me to AW and I since considered it worthwhile to subscribe here.
I actually strongly suspect that AW were using that site as an outlet for teasers. Who knows
Comment
-
Originally posted by doggieIt might be difficult, with the amount of material they have... but the basic principle of the site is that people submit their pictures and other users judge them, the winner getting a cash prize. No online community supporting that kind of competition is gonna stand for people submitting ripped off material!! So I'm certain there is nothing malicious going on from the 'bunch of cunts' previously referred to.
It is their JOB to ensure they have a release of a model - and proof of age - before they publish her images on the internet. Indeed, it's ilegal in sever countries (Australia, and the US, where they have run the site from).
Having said all that - the first time I saw AW material was on a site that gathers pictures from file sharing newsgroups - now those people were definitely ripping people's stuff off, but, it exposed me to AW and I since considered it worthwhile to subscribe here. I actually strongly suspect that AW were using that site as an outlet for teasers. Who knows
a
Comment
-
Originally posted by AbbyWell, you can be as sure as you like. Our experience is different. For example, they frequentyly ignore our cease and desist notices, for example, as if they "know" they have rights to use our images.If they left our brand on, I'd not be so pissy.
In most cases I no longer bother going directly to the offending webmaster. In the United States I use a law called the Digital Millenium Copyright Act to force the internet providers to take down the offending material. The law is written such that if we notify the ISP, the ISP becomes liable for copyright violations if they fail to act. Normally all it takes is a properly-written email (which is now just a copy-and-paste with some URLs stuffed into the right spot). Most ISPs jump right on it; I've only had to go as far as a certified letter once (and that DID get managements' attention).
For offenders elsewhere in the world, I can't invoke the DMCA because it doesn't apply there, so I just stick to the polite will you please help us letter to the ISP's abuse department, which is usually all it takes.
If they'd just leave our copyrights on there, we'd pretty much leave them alone.
Rainbow
Comment
-
Abby is right on this one; it's now my responsibility to deal with this directly. And not only do they rip our stuff off, they usually don't bother to respond to our requests to remove it.
have never seen AW material on there, and the reasons are painfully obvious.
The site owners don't produce their own material, it all comes from contributors in a competition
given certain themes - like 'best blow job' for example...
They don' want AW material It goes against the whole philosophy of the site.
Head and brick wall comes to mind Whatever
Comment
-
-
Comment