Two girls in IM

[tuurkens]

Fantastic, for me.
But, last days... a lot of times they talk to much and didn't spend enough time on the real action.
Sometimes it's coming over to me as "not serious" and that some orgasms are fake just because...not enough time.

[takochan]

Welcome to the boards, tuurkens. If I may, I'd like to offer two comments on your post.

(1)

But, last days... a lot of times they talk too much and didn't spend enough time on the real action.

There's a wide variety of tastes among members, and for quite a lot of them Double IMs are very special, especially when there is interaction (verbal as well as physical) between the models — indeed, for some members, the talk is as much part of the "main action" as the self-pleasuring.

I don't know if you realize this, but the whole idea of DIMs originated from a suggestion by a member. In the earlier ones the two models hardly interacted at all (and some really didn't), but there has been a trend toward more interactive DIMs — though quite a few are less interactive.

The models are free to do what they please. Having models do what they please — naturally and spontaneously — is an essential part of what AW is about.

(2)

Sometimes it's coming over to me as "not serious" and that some orgasms are fake just because...not enough time.

One of AW's core commitments is to present real sex, with no fake orgasms, and I believe you can be assured on that point (You may have noticed that in some non-IM solo shoots the accompanying blurb may even explicitly state that the model did not have an orgasm — how many other sites are that honest?).

With IMs, I have absolutely no doubt that the orgasms are real — not just because "the company says they are and I believe them", though it is true that after four years of membership I have no doubt as to the honesty and integrity of the people running the site.

The girls are free to take their time to reach genuine orgasm— some take more time, some less, but I've never heard of any of them being under time pressure, or of faking it just to "get the shoot over". If any of them have been faking then they are brilliant actresses, because I believe the staff and management (many of whom have been models themselves) know enough to recognize a fake orgasm when they see one and have the ethics and integrity not to put it on our screens.


That's my two bits' worth, anyway.

鮹ちゃん

[cleo]

If staff looked through a video (and they do scrutinise them, edit them look through them ect) and saw what they thought to be a faked orgasm, that model would not get anymore work with AW.com...I'm pretty sure of that.
They always always say to try hard to orgasm but if you cant, do not fake it.

[tuurkens]

I can understand what your are telling, but, if more than 60% of the video is only talking and laughing (even during the action...) I don't think the girls can't be prepared to have a real orgasm in a few minutes. For me a good example of what I mean is the Im from Magdalin and Odette from a few days ago...

[cleo]

well we have all the time we need to orgasm

[MzSilkyMyst]

Personally, the term 'Intimate Moments' conveys far more than merely 'girls getting off' or 'orgasms on demand'. I find the genuine intimacy, shared or individual eroticism and context chosen (mood, setting, ambiance, etc) work far better than just having the models orgasming. Just my views. It's been said (correctly IMO) that variety is the most savory spice of life. With so many models and members there's room for endless forms of expressions, explorations and pleasures.

Give me authenticity and realism every time. As always, my compliments and appreciations to the models and staff at AW for bringing us a window into these realms.

Great responses above Cleo & Takochan.

Time to dash along to the day gig and jumpstart another work week...*wheee*

[takochan]

Personally, the term 'Intimate Moments' conveys far more than merely 'girls getting off' or 'orgasms on demand'. I find the genuine intimacy, shared or individual eroticism and context chosen (mood, setting, ambiance, etc) work far better than just having the models orgasming. Just my views.

Not just yours, Silky—definitely mine too. And so beautifully expressed — great!!

鮹ちゃん

[tuurkens]

Have a look to the IM of today (Juanita & Mayla) and don't tell me that this is not an "orgasmic fake"...once more bla,bla,bla...a great bodyshake (from the girl on the right) and a lot of moaning, she even had a small look to the camera...

So, the new IM (different times a week now...) for me that was fantastic news, but we had a price to pay...
More quantity...less quality...I had not expected this from AW...

[cleo]

hmm...I just watched the mayla and jaunita DIM and I dont quite see what you mean. there was some chatting and they helped each other get naked and then got down to business with ample time to be able to orgasm.

i'm sorry, I just don't see it

[hauskatavata]

Have a look to the IM of today (Juanita & Mayla) and don't tell me that this is not an "orgasmic fake"...once more bla,bla,bla...a great bodyshake (from the girl on the right) and a lot of moaning, she even had a small look to the camera...

So, the new IM (different times a week now...) for me that was fantastic news, but we had a price to pay...
More quantity...less quality...I had not expected this from AW...

She started off joking around, and then had what appeared to a real one, to my untrained eye.

Sorry tuurkens, but I gotta disagree with you. It only works if the models approach it the way they want to approach it. There are hundreds of videos on the site, don't expect to have your world rocked by each and every one of them...

[FloridaRob]

How, ever, are we online dorks, male, and even female, to really judge a stranger's orgasm???

To me, there are an infinite variety among women. We guys pretty much define one as a visible ejaculation, after which we pass out, (of course)!

Women, of course, are nearly a different species on this planet and, if we've learned nothing else here, women have an infinite variety of ways to enjoy themselves and to evidence mild, moderate, and earthquake orgasms.

Surprising to me, even, that such could be "officially" determined by a panel of, even, veteran AW observers!

... I know! The answer to that is that AW peeps don't really presume to "affirm" anyone's orgasm. Rather, they are charged with the oh-so-difficult task of selecting appropriately demonstrative orgasms, no offense being allowed toward that less spectacular display.

Am I right??


(Of course, I'm right! We can move on now!)

[OdetteAW]

I can understand what your are telling, but, if more than 60% of the video is only talking and laughing (even during the action...) I don't think the girls can't be prepared to have a real orgasm in a few minutes. For me a good example of what I mean is the Im from Magdalin and Odette from a few days ago...

I just thought i would add firstly that both magdalene and i had orgasms in our double im and that i actually have a little bit of a problem wiht COMING TOO QUICKLY. i can make myself orgasm in a really short amount of time and i think you will find that with some girls who know how to pleasure themselves this is not completely uncommon.
I think that it's really nice whatching the rappor between girls in the videos and often that does involve talking and stories and laughing and talking about sex. For me it woulb be slightly strange to be like, ok, lie down, don't talk, orgasm. what you see in the dim's is a different kind of erotic connection between girls. Maybe that's not for everyone and that's fine, but for me it is a contrast between the girl girl shoots wich are obviously explicit, it's more intimite (hence the name) and sort of innocent. like girls at a sleepover party

[cleo]

i'm the same odette, I have to go REALLY slow to draw my masturbation out longer than around 2 or so minutes...that wouldnt make a very interesting video at all...

[dirtysickal]

Cheers, Cleo and Odette!
Beautiful, frank, and sharing women like you continue to make AW the best erotica site, bar none!
Allen

[arsby]

i'm the same odette, I have to go REALLY slow to draw my masturbation out longer than around 2 or so minutes...that wouldnt make a very interesting video at all...

Isn't it almost time for the AW Winter Olympics?

One of my favorite sports is Olympic Women's Speed Masturbation.

Go Cleo GO! No wait! Cum Cleo Cum!

[cleo]

maybe i'll do some time trials. see how fast I can really be.

[dirtysickal]

maybe i'll do some time trials. see how fast I can really be.

I'll hold the stop watch
(always happy to help)

[alexbee]

maybe i'll do some time trials. see how fast I can really be.

Do you orgasm as quickly with intercourse or does it take longer that way??

[cleo]

im not particularly fast to orgasm during sex...
its pretty different though

[OdetteAW]

i'm the same odette, I have to go REALLY slow to draw my masturbation out longer than around 2 or so minutes...that wouldnt make a very interesting video at all...

oh good, it nice to not be alone on that one. i find it a little irritating to be told how i should and shouldn't come! but maye i should time myself. that would be kind of funny...

[lanbo]

Isn't it almost time for the AW Winter Olympics?

One of my favorite sports is Olympic Women's Speed Masturbation.

Go Cleo GO! No wait! Cum Cleo Cum!

Of course, the winner makes a spurt for the finishing line.

[cleo]

hahaha...
oddette, I think u should time urself...we'll have a cum-off hahaha...theres nothing at all wrong with rubbing out a quick one.

I didnt have a acurate timer...but last night, I started at 11:46 and finished by 11:48 so thats around 2 minutes!!!! annnd that felt like it took quiet a long time...i'll find a stop watch...have time trials with myself and see if I can get it down to a PB.

[dirtysickal]

oh good, it nice to not be alone on that one. i find it a little irritating to be told how i should and shouldn't come! but maye i should time myself. that would be kind of funny...

What kind of pompous nut-job would even think of dictating details of another's orgasm?
It's all good...
Have you ever counted how many times you can come in a given time frame? What are your personal bests?
And Cleo...how goes the squirting?
Allen

[cleo]

im not going at getting myself there more than once in a row...i get overly sensitive...
I'm too scared to try and squirt lol...

[FloridaRob]

hahaha...
oddette, I think u should time urself...we'll have a cum-off hahaha...theres nothing at all wrong with rubbing out a quick one.

I didnt have a acurate timer...but last night, I started at 11:46 and finished by 11:48 so thats around 2 minutes!!!! annnd that felt like it took quiet a long time...i'll find a stop watch...have time trials with myself and see if I can get it down to a PB.

... F-ing awesome! I've posted about "quickies" before, had some support from Marigold and know there's more on tap. Even Ms. Abby popped in to say she was working on some "quickies" in the IM department. I think she probably worked those in without fanfare as there are orgasms, just in the past week, that were less than three minutes, (awesome)!

It's not hard to peruse the library videos of IMs to see single and double "performances" ranging from a few minutes to nearly an hour! We know that none were any shorter and, probably, many were a bit longer than what survives the "cutting room floor".

I, for one, really enjoy the "reality" and "intensity" of the quick orgasm. It totally reveals and displays "hidden" horniness in the extreme, leaves us guys in awe and respect! It's rarely a traditional display of feminine beauty but is, actually, so much more powerful, a sharing of a super-personal moment with an often half-dressed, totally frustrated siren. It just doesn't get better than that for so many of us worshipers of real women! I think that "real guys" just want to be there, next to the objects of their affection and obsession. It's like, just "go for it, girl!" Big hugs, afterward, for sharing. We're all just human beings here! Let's celebrate our sexuality with total abandon and safe intimacy and indulgence in whatever is the most satisfying and intense!

[OdetteAW]

Okay, tonight i will time myself! (or get someone to time me) i will report back with the details (i don't have the internet at home so mostly use the uni computers (it does generate some strange looks actually....))

[cleo]

Okay, tonight i will time myself! (or get someone to time me) i will report back with the details (i don't have the internet at home so mostly use the uni computers (it does generate some strange looks actually....))

Oh My Goodness! I would be far too scared to use the uni computers to look at Abby Winters I'm alreadyscared people will judge me for going on facebook on them etc...let alone checking out porn!! You've got guts!! xx

[dirtysickal]

Okay, tonight i will time myself! (or get someone to time me) i will report back with the details (i don't have the internet at home so mostly use the uni computers (it does generate some strange looks actually....))

Are you both in Melbourne? Time each other! (more Cleo pics as well?)
Allen

[OdetteAW]

Oh My Goodness! I would be far too scared to use the uni computers to look at Abby Winters I'm alreadyscared people will judge me for going on facebook on them etc...let alone checking out porn!! You've got guts!! xx

I know, it sucks, but i have a system! i make the window quite small, and mostly just check the front page and the boards, it's a shame as it means i don't have as much opportunity to look at the shoots and videos as i'd like to . i figured that people were generally to absorbed in what they were doing to worry to much about me. Otherwise i can say i'm doing research for gender studies!
x
ps- about 2 minutes 33 seconds....

[FloridaRob]

Now that you mention it, the one time I visited the library in our new "home town" in North Carolina, it was to use their wireless Internet access with my laptop. After checking my email and such, since I was nestled in a chair with my back to a corner, I went for a peek at the Abby site but could not access it because it was on some sort of list the library's service provider had screened so that nothing adult could be visited in the library!

How about that?