I've gotta say that, of the alleged "five-some" of web-sites about which we chat, BA seems to be the one I'd never have imagined could deliver any financial success. I know what it's about. I've seen a few dozen of the videos. It's an interesting, artsy sort of thing but I would have thought it better suited to some sort of dramatic arts doctoral thesis than a commercially viable web site. Honestly, it's "long-term" value to me is, (sadly), maybe US$5.00 a month?? I think I'd rank them AW, IFM, ISM, GOW, BA, something like that!?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Abby Girls on IFM ISM GOW
Collapse
X
-
-
Hi, Rob, you and I are compatible on almost everything (particularly the goddess-ness of Sue Ann), but I disagree on BA. Actually, I do agree on the orgasm part, but the Confessions are incredible.Listening to Susie talk, and Maria's discussions with her boyfriend are wonderful. I've saved them all, put them on CD and listen in the car. I'd have to rank BA just behind AW for value.
Comment
-
Originally posted by aggie64 View PostHi, Rob, you and I are compatible on almost everything (particularly the goddess-ness of Sue Ann), but I disagree on BA. Actually, I do agree on the orgasm part, but the Confessions are incredible.Listening to Susie talk, and Maria's discussions with her boyfriend are wonderful. I've saved them all, put them on CD and listen in the car. I'd have to rank BA just behind AW for value.
Second, I see that I misspoke in saying I "know what BA is about" since I either missed or had forgotten about the Confessions. All I could remember were the hundreds, nay, thousands of faces! There's only so far you can go with faces!
Comment
-
Originally posted by aggie64 View PostI don't even watch the faces, but I save all the confessions.
Hey, I have question for you all. I know GOW is in Melbourne. Are the other sites as well? Or some of them in Sidney?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FloridaRob View PostSecond, I see that I misspoke in saying I "know what BA is about"
Surely you were 'mistaken', it sounds so much better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Everard View PostMISSPOKE?, Rob. Isn't that Hilary Clinton speak? That was her excuse when caught out by the media after telling a pack of lies to make her look good. It caused a lot of amusement here In the UK where we call it 'lying'.
Surely you were 'mistaken', it sounds so much better.
I had to think about this one for a minute as I, literally, haven't heard a word spoken by The Mouth since she sucked it up and turned off her incessant sound bytes and got in line behind the better choice. She gets very little press here, lately.
If I "misspeak", I think the implication is that I was not "mistaken"; I knew better but, somehow, the words just spilled out in a way that, in all innocence, was incorrect relative to the truth actually known to me. See that subtle difference? The Clintons, being consummate American attorneys, are wordsmiths. Wasn't it Uncle Bill who said something like, "It depends on what the meaning of 'is' is"?
While I'm an ardent Democrat, I was never a fan of Hillary, at all. I thought she boring, transparent, disingenuous, conniving, self-important, and for whatever she preached, still in fact, disrespected the American people by talking down to them, largely through her dreadful, painful efforts to deliver sound-bytes for the press covering whatever event. I'd have rather put her husband and his ugly floozies back in the saddle for a third term. At least he could think on his feet and give a speech, nothing like your MPs, etc., but pretty good for an American. I could go on but, of course, we gather here to praise our friends down under!
Comment
-
OT- Humpty Dumpty (Alice on the brain lately)
Hiya fellas. This is not a shot at anyone- I'm just feeling in a sharin' mood. (Yep. I'm a weirdo. Scroll on by. LOL).
Conversations about words (particularly the hilarious absurdities in law and politics- well, hilarious if the people involved weren't so seriously invested in the semantic slithering they were engaged in) always remind me of Humpty Dumpty in Through the Looking Glass.
(the bit about half way down the page, starting with: `I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said.)
Peace
DD
Comment
-
-
-
Because of Immie I rejoined ISM - a lot of beautiful new pics from our beloved Immie.
And I found a bunch of AW girls not listed so far - therefore a new update.
By the way - Katherine's IFM isn't up yet, Roxy's IFM and ISM ditto.Attached Files
Comment
-
the name game on IFM is frankly annoying. also the attempt at low to no lights for art sake is annoying as well. Had to take a temporary break from IFM because of the site lay out and short lengths of down loadable videos.. 1.47 mins to 5 or 6 mins is just too brief to be enjoyable. AW has it heads above this site. beautiful girls on both sites. I will check their site regularly and will rejoin if they address some of these issues.
jbflaus
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ziggyzen View PostOOo Nadine has sex with a boy on GoW
I'm thinking about subscribing to Girls Out West. Can anyone recommend it? Or against it?
If she's "growing" at that site, then bless her and please go enjoy her. Personally, I'm a bit out in the cold over Nadine, sadly! Maybe I'm alone??
Comment
-
Originally posted by FloridaRob View PostPersonally, I will confess, now, to being a bit disappointed by Nadine. She was among the most beautiful, serene models ever seen here. Yet she found herself more ensconced in the somewhat less "classy" show at GOW. I don't believe she was active much, if at all, in our message boards. We really didn't get to know her.
If she's "growing" at that site, then bless her and please go enjoy her. Personally, I'm a bit out in the cold over Nadine, sadly! Maybe I'm alone??
Comment
-
'classy' is probably the wrong word to describe the difference between GOW and AW. But there IS a difference between the two sites, I think we'll all agree on that? The same girl can look rather different (and do different things) on GOW if you've only seen her on AW prior.
Rob, it might be easier just *not* to look at GOW if you don't like their style. That way you won't know what other shoots some AW models did over there. Knowledge isn't always a blessing ya know. Just enjoy Nadine's sets on AW in blissfull ignorance
Comment
-
Originally posted by Frans View Post'classy' is probably the wrong word to describe the difference between GOW and AW. But there IS a difference between the two sites, I think we'll all agree on that? The same girl can look rather different (and do different things) on GOW if you've only seen her on AW prior.
Rob, it might be easier just *not* to look at GOW if you don't like their style. That way you won't know what other shoots some AW models did over there. Knowledge isn't always a blessing ya know. Just enjoy Nadine's sets on AW in blissfull ignorance
Does anyone else have any helpful insight into GoW for someone who is considering giving it a try?
Comment
-
Originally posted by FloridaRob View PostIf she's "growing" at that site, then bless her and please go enjoy her. Personally, I'm a bit out in the cold over Nadine, sadly! Maybe I'm alone??
For me the BG shoot with Nadine was a big disappointment. It doesn't have the quality of the few Abby BG's. It's boring and some kind of classical hardcore mainstream porn.
But that's just for me - I was never interested in porn before I found AW.
Comment
Comment